The Blake Livley suit pushed Justin’s intuitive rejection, which raises support from many advocacy groups, who say that the case threatens the legal protection that is obtained hard for people who talk about sexual harassment and misconduct.
Advocates of equality, a legal institution based in San Francisco, which calls for gender equality and the protection of the workplace, presented a summary on Tuesday urging a federal judge to adhere to vital demand and defend the free freedom law in California, California, protects those who publicly talk about sexual abuse. Elis Dorshi also presented a separate speech speech, the former federal employee and survivors of sexual harassment, who described his prosecution on charges of defamation after speaking to him and said that the law was the subject of discussion that could have been spared by legal ordeal for a year. The additional summaries in the coming days are expected to be of the call groups including Child Usa and Sanctuary for families.
The summaries are distinguished by the latest Salvo in A. Legal clash for months Between Lively and Baldoni, who is successful caused by the production of romantic drama for the past year “IT first Us” in court and press.
When asked about the summaries, Lively spokesperson said in a statement that Balouni was “trying to end the only” Metoo “law in the country as” unconstitutional “and accused him and his accusations of the participants of” focusing very on trying to harm the lady to the point that they are ready to reduce a law determined to ensure that they “focus on.” On behalf of herself and others. “
Livly Baldoni, the co-star and director of the film, accused her harassment during filming, citing high physical communication, inappropriate behavior and alleged revenge after raising the fears of the allegations that he implemented. Defenders say that their case highlights the type of public allegations that the law was aimed at protection, and warns that the ruling against it could calm the rhetoric about the harassment.
“If the law is supposed to be disturbed, this will not affect Brick vitality – it will get rid of protection for all survivors,” said Jessica Chidlo, legal director at Child Usa, a non -profit organization calling for protection for the strongest survivors of abuse. “This will be a devastating setback and completely undermines the purpose of the law, which makes it easier for the victims to progress and talk about the truth without fear of revenge.”
vital The law is required – Civil Section in California, Section 47.1, which was yearned in 2023 as part of the Association Bill 933 – in a proposal submitted in March to dismiss A debt suit of $ 400 millionWho claims to have accused him of falsehood and revenge and tried to control the film from it.
A team of legal inferiority strongly opposed the suggestion of the separation, on the pretext that LVly’s accusations were intentionally wrong and that the statute that I himself protested himself is unconstitutional. They argue that the law goes very far by threatening sharp financial penalties, saying that people may inhibit the court to defend themselves against wrong accusations.
“In any way, in this proposal or at any stage of this procedure, will the first amendment allow extremist and unconstitutional grants of fees, costs and the required triple and punitive damage,” as stipulates the deposit.
This position sparked a sharp response from Victoria Burke, the lawyer who helped pay AB 933, and is now leading efforts to pass similar legislation in 16 other states.
“I was very disappointed with this step,” said Burke, who is presenting her summary in the case. “He put himself as a church, and this draws a lot of good that he was doing. It seemed harsh and unnecessary – to try to destroy a law that was designed to protect all survivors, just to go after that.”
AB 933 is designed to protect people who talk about sexual harassment, assault or discrimination from revenge defamation claims, provided that their statements with “actual malice” are. It also includes a changing changing item that requires uncomfortable plaintiffs to pay legal costs and allow triglycerides and punitive damage.
In a file on March 4 at the New York Federal Court, La Flei’s lawyers argued that an inferior counter is exactly the type of revenge that was supposed to be prevented by the California law.
“The law prohibits lawsuits for defamation of weapons, such as this, revenge against individuals who have submitted legal claims or publicly talked about sexual harassment and revenge.”
The case was the first major test of AB 933 since he signed the law by the governor of the states of the Newsom in October 2023. The result can put an early precedent for the extent of the courts’ willingness to go to support the law – and what protection it ultimately provides for those who talk about the alleged peak.
“With more survivors, the people who have been hurting them were increasingly using the defamation claims as weapons to try to silence them,” said Jessica Standard, a lawmaker of the advocates of equal rights, said one of the organizations that participate in obtaining an amount of wealthy at all-when highly seen money or in a state of defending this. They see what can happen even for a rich and famous person, and think, “This can happen to me, and I cannot take this opportunity.”
Lively team, in the summary of the response on May 13, defended the constitutionality of the law and confirmed that her public statements were protected by 933 AB.
Its lawyers wrote: “The first amendment enables the legislative bodies to protect the rights of the first amendment of the victims through the rules for changing the fees designed to deter revenge.”
The court has not yet ruled at the request of cash. If it is granted, it may deal with a major blow to inflict capture – and the formation of how AB 933 is interpreted in future cases that involve general allegations of misconduct.
While other states are looking to adopt similar legislation, defenders say the result of the case can have traces of ripples beyond California.
“We want to be able to ensure that there is a social and legal environment where you can speak the truth and report sexual assault and harassment without fear of prosecuting it,” said Dorcin Leddt, chief manager of legal services at Sanctuary for Hames, a non -profit institution based in New York that provides legal services and support for survivors of gender -based violence. “Legal reprisals such as the procedures provided by Mr. Baldouni and his team cause tremendous damage to the victims, not only in California but all over the country – not only affect celebrity victims, but ordinary people.”
