Trump administration ‘villainizes’ immigrant families with misleading directive on food aid | Trump administration

the Trump administration Famous programs to combat anthrax, including food aid and school lunch, are now used as part of its attack against immigrants in the United States-a step that many say will prevent large numbers of families, especially children, from obtaining the nutritional benefits they are right.

In a conversation note“It is necessary to use all the available legal authority to end any incentives in FNS benefits that encourage illegal immigration.”

In the accompanying press statement, Rollins He said“Days in which taxpayers are used to support illegal immigration have ended.”

Although Rollins does not change people’s access, researchers, defenders and service providers say that he publishes wrong information about immigrants that are not documented and can create a chilling effect Trump administration.

“The situation is trying to harm societies,” said Juan Carlos Gomez, a graduate policy analyst at the Center for Law and Social Policy (Clasp). Unable immigrants were not unable 42 million People, long before Trump’s first state, and even migrants authorized to be in the United States, must wait Five years Before serving.

He said: “The bloc of wrong information from the minister” is similar to the seed that will continue to grow, so that people begin to “think that uncomfortable immigrants get the benefits of no.”

Other FNS programs, such as the National School Lunch program, which provides low -cost lunch or free to it 30 million School students, or An emergency food aid program (TEFAP), which earns meals for low -income families with free foods for the US Department of Agriculture distributed by food banks, does not have sexual requirements like Snap.

“It seems really that migratory families are aimed at getting food from their paintings in their families,” said California State University, Professor San Bernadino. Emily LovinglandThose looking for social care programs such as Snap.

Snap, which provides about $ 6 per day per person, is already difficult to reach and use. There are complex civil rules, and applicants must provide verification and complete an interview to receive food advantages. The Democrats and the Republicans rose Discounts Or the changes it faces in the past, and the Republicans in the House of Representatives recently targeted the program to settle the budget as a way to pay the price of the 2017 tax bill that benefits from the wealthy.

“[The directive] “It is part of a broader story for people who get benefits. It is ultimately part of a plan to get rid of benefits, whether through administrative work, illegal work or reconciliation plan in Congress to reduce surprise and drumming as a tax of biomus’ tax pieces,” said Lily Roberts, Managing Director of Comprehensive Growth at the American Progress Center.

If the Trump administration wants to change people’s arrival to Snap, it can only be done by changing the law, not by executive or guidance. However, even the perceived threat to change policy is sufficient to produce The effects of chilling Which directly affects the health of migratory families in the United States.

research He showed that in 2016, a proposal change for the general charge rule – which determines whether people looking for a migration may depend on government aid – led to a “large and large decrease” in the participation of migrant families in food aid and nutrition programs such as Snap, the school breakfast program and the National School Lunch program.

“I think we have learned in the first Trump administration that the speech is often concerned with the actual behavior of people,” said Chloe East, professor of economics at Colorado Denver, who studies safety and immigration insurance programs. “Even families with the children of American citizens are less likely to receive a surprise because parents are afraid that they will affect their migration position or may lead to deportation.”

a fourth Of all children we have at least one immigrant father 4.4 million They live with one of the non -documented parents.

Based on the census office Data From 2016 to 2019, researchers at the Institute of Immigration Policy found that participation in Snap, temporary assistance to needy families (Tanf) and Medicaid decreased twice quickly among non -citizens such as citizens during the first three years of the first Trump administration. During that time, sudden participation decreased by 37 %.

In 2020, the controversial public charge reviews entered into force, making it difficult for immigrants to obtain green cards or temporary visas if they participate in the public benefits programs that were tested in the federalism such as Snap. The entire process planted confusion and fear, even if even the refugees and children born in the United States – groups are not required to conduct a general assessment of the charge – without the required nutritional assistance because they are concerned about themselves or a family member who gets a green card.

(The Trump administration’s general accusation base was later extinguished by multiple courts and was withdrawn by the Biden Administration.)

Based on what happened with the public charge in the past, Gomez’s Gomez and other immigrant defenders expect a similar pattern of overcoming Snap programs and other nutrition programs due to the Minister of Agriculture, which was published on February 25, along with other anti -migrant policies from the administration.

He said: “These executive requests and directives are the service providers who must already deal with this long laundry list about who is qualified for what.” “This is the effect that we will see in all migrant societies, this ambiguity of what people or not qualified for it even though at the end of the day, an executive or secretary does not change the law.”

East expected that the new administration will come after the eligibility of immigration or the arrival of migrants to Snap through changes about work requirements or a type of public fee again. She said: “What I did not expect is the current budget reconciliation proposals, which would generally destroy the program.” “They use all non -legislative tools that can reduce access to Snap, but it is very difficult to predict what will happen legislative.”

Loveland believes that the US Department of Agriculture can try to control the requirements of nutrition programs that do not require proof of citizenship, such as school food programs and TEFAP, which may eventually mean that people who do not have documents may not be able to reach them and they will have to rely on already special charitable food programs or food risk. If the National School Lunch program is restricted, this may mean that uncomfortable students will go without free school meals or reduce price.

She said: “Although their plans to restrict any policy requirements are currently mysterious, my anxiety is that even the announcement of the intention to target these programs can have a chilling impact that is bodied among the migrant families, such as what happened with Snap and the 2019 general charge base.” “They burn their concerns about an ideological attack on immigrants, which does not depend on reality or reality.”