“We should be better than this”: SCOTUS allows Trump to continue deportations on technicality

the supreme court Stand up with the president Donald Trump On Monday night, raised a The judge ordered With the exception of the Trump official from the deportation of Venezuelan immigrants under Foreign enemies Law in 1798.

in 5-4 ResolutionThe court has evacuated temporary restrictions issued by the DC James Provincial Court judge. It is not signed by Scotus if Trump had power People deported according to the law of warInstead, the case was filed against the Trump administration in the wrong place.

The majority maintained a straight face while they said that the Capital Capital Court was an inappropriate place to challenge the actions of the President’s administration. When raising the temporary ban on deportation, advise the prosecutors to file future complaints in Texas. In a small victory for civil rights groups, they noticed that deported cases are subject to judicial review.

“Despite all the opponents’ speech, today and Per Curiam affirms that the detainees who are subject to removal orders under AEA are entitled to note and an opportunity to
They wrote, “They wrote,” The only question is which court will solve this challenge. “

Absorbing this idea in opposition, justice Sonia Sotomoor He said that thinking about the majority should have led them to leave it in place while hearing the case.

She wrote in one of the opponents: “Even the majority corresponds to today, and the federal government now recognizes that individuals subject to removal under the law of foreign enemies are entitled to adequate notice and judicial review before they are removed. Elena Kaganand Kentianji Brown Jackson In part of it, Amy Kony Barrett.

Sotomayor is anxious about the “wrong damage” that the prosecutors may face if they are He was deported to El Salvador Before hearing their case, indicating that the Trump administration “is an attempt[ed] to Sabotage of the judicial process Throughout this litigation. “

Sotomayor added that the ruling circle “cannot be explained as it is dangerous.” Avoid the law.

“We, as a nation and the court of law, must be better than this,” she wrote.