Wellness

Idaho Cuts Public Health Benefits for Undocumented Immigrants

Boise, Idaho – With the spread of measles across other states, Idaho ends the audience’s vaccinations for people who live in the United States illegally.

A new law signed to Republican Governor Brad Little will stop a variety of general benefits of those in the United States illegally, including testing infectious diseases, prenatal and postpartum care for women, and advice to crises and some nutritional assistance to children.

It seems that the Idahu state law, which falls on July 1, is the first specific general health advantages since President Donald Trump has ordered federal agencies to enhance eligibility and ensure that general advantages will not be unchasatable for immigrants. Similar measures have been suggested in several other cases.

The restrictions on public advantages are part of a wider effort in the countries led by Republicans to support the Trump campaign on illegal immigration. Some states have denied driver licenses, abolishing university tuition rates within the country and increasing criminal sanctions for migrants in the United States illegally. Since Trump took office, there were more than three times in the number of law enforcement agencies and local states with agreements to help impose federal immigration laws.

Federal law in general migrants in the United States illegally banned from receiving the advantages funded by the taxpayer through programs such as social security, medical care, medical assistance and temporary assistance to families in need of several decades. But there are some exceptions, such as emergency medical care.

The states had flexibility to provide some other advantages regardless of the state of immigration, either through federal options or by financing them only in state dollars. Idahu states some of these special tige with the state law.

Republican Senator Phil Hart, one of the sponsors of the draft law, said that it is still possible to use state funding for medical emergency services regardless of a person’s legal residency, as well as the services provided to the baby born in the United States to one of the parents who are not legally in the country. But he said that another person would have to measure an invoice for things like vaccines or prenatal health care.

“No one is prevented from reaching any of these services. What you do is to prevent the state of Idahu from paying the price of these,” Hart said during a discussion in the Senate last week.

But opponents claim that restricting preventive health care-especially that the outbreak of measles in Texas is spreading to other countries-will threaten Idahu’s public health and undermine the position of the anti-abortion state.

“We are proud to be a life -supporting country, and I am participating in this goal,” Republican Senator Jim Gutri said during the discussion. “But in this case, the legislation that denies prenatal care can present the life of the newborn.”

Valerie Lacarti, chief policy analyst at the Institute of Immigration, a non -profit research center based in Washington, DC, said that the new borders on public advantages can praise some of the immigrants who are legally in the United States from going to health clinics or applying for services.

“Just a request to impose immigration has a chilling effect on people’s participation,” said La Carti on Tuesday.

“You want the largest possible number of people to vaccinate,” she said. But “if you start providing restrictions, exceptions – just narrowing who is qualified – is somewhat common to see that confusion is spreading.”

Some healthcare providers in Idaho, such as Terry Reillly Health Services, are still struggling with how the new law is applied. The Community Health Center in the southwest of Idahu provides medical, dental and mental health services for low -income and unbelievable persons.

“We are just trying to determine the best we can provide services to our patients while staying in the law,” said Claudia Wesson, Director of Communications for Terry Riley Health Services.

The Idaho FoodBank, who runs two government food programs, said that the vast majority of its food is either donated or purchased with donated money, which is not affected by the new law.

“We will continue to serve anyone who has a ugly need for food,” said Randy Ford, President of Idaho Ford.

Several industrial and religious groups opposed legislation, including food producers in Idaho, Idaho Dairymen Association, the IDAHO Association for Trade and Industry, Catholic diocese and the ethical government. But the legislation is supported by the Idahu Fundamental Foundation, which is a right -wing political research group and a group of pressure.

___

Lipp of Jefferson City, Missouri.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button