I’ll solve the loneliness epidemic with AI, says Mark Zuckerberg. But isn’t his best mate even more money? | Emma Brockes
MARK Zuckerberg made a promotional tour to talk about the potential of artificial intelligence in human relations. I know; Listen to Zuck on Friendship is somewhat similar to taking commercial advice from Bernie Madouf Or lessons in the sporting spirit from Tonia Harding. But in recent technical conferences and on podcasts, Zouk said he has I saw the future It is the one in which the “unity epidemic” in the world is diluted by people who find friendship with “a system he knows well and this type of understanding them in the way they do their nutritional algorithms.” In essence, we will be friends with artificial intelligence, instead of people. The missing air is quoted about “he knows” and “understands” is a discrimination that we can assume that Zuck does not know or understand.
This batch will be by a 41 -year -old technology leader less surprising if it is not a matter of the fact that on the Internet is almost regular now you can find people writing about their relationships with their processor or chat bot and insists that if it is real for them, this is real. Chatbot is, they will argue, “effectively” listen to them. On a Podcast with Duarcash Patel Last month, Zouk depicted near “you will be passed through your summary, and there will be content that may seem like a ball to start, but you can talk to it, or interact with it and speak again.” He said that the ordinary Americans had less than three friends, but it needs more. Presto, a ready solution.
It is clear that the problem is not that chatting with the robot gives the illusion of intimate relationship, but in the world of Zuckerberg, it cannot be distinguished from the true intimate relationship, which is a rewarding and meaningful version of man to man. If this is not logical, Zuck, either the meaning of words changes or we must reach new words: “Over time,” says Zuckerberg, where more and more people resort to artificial intelligence friends, “We will find vocabulary as a society to be able to express a valuable cause.”
Intuitively is that these vocabulary Zuckerberg hopes to develop that the equivalent of the English language for one of those German words complex with the ability to express, in one term, the “value” of Chatbot as “something that may seem as it looks somewhat similar to the required definition, but it may fulfill the privacy of anything in which nothing understands for awareness of the definition of definition – – as a bombing of the seventies.”
Instead, what Zuck seems to be that we will only relax the current meanings of words such as “man”, “understanding”, “knowledge” and “relationship” to include the product of the artificial intelligence he sells. After all, this is just an extension of the argument he gave in 2006 when we first sold us on Facebook: that is, online or computerized interaction as if it was not better than the real thing.
The absolute error of this argument is so blatant that it puts anyone who gives it more than one idea in the strange position of having to define reality units such as “the person.” To extend the logic of Zuckerberg: the book can make you feel lonely and that this feeling can be real. This does not mean that your relationship with the author is real, intimate or mutual in anything like the way there is a relationship with your friends.
Should we include roads? Given the easy refusal of Zuckerberg for basic standards, I think we should. Human friends are aware and fast to respond in an unpredictable way that increases our own feeling regarding them. In practical terms, human friends can offer us to other people, one of them we may offer, marry, or offer them a job through our current friends who feed us and laugh. Fortunately, artificial intelligence friends cannot make us go to camp or force us to organize the night of the chicken. But this is because our relationship with Amnesty International’s friend is not a relationship at all, and when we talk to them, we are alone in the room.
A worse issue than fraud, regardless of the terrible possibility that the only people – especially young people – this type of “intimate relationship” will be sold in response to their problems and discourages them from searching for other people, is that any interaction with artificial intelligence is through commercial necessity in nature. Perhaps this is simply where we are now. If you want a real and shaved soul level, look for someone who looks at you in a way that Chatbot AI looks at your data.
