Lobbyist claims that New York anti-plastic bill would harm people of color called ‘misleading’ | New York

The oil and petrochemical lobby tries to enhance a New York Advocates and sources of assembly say, although the plastic supply chain poses serious health risks for black and brown communities, although the plastic supply chain poses serious health risks for black and brown societies, although the plastic supply chain poses serious health risks to black and brown societies, although the plastic supply chain poses serious health risks to black societies The structure is that the state’s proposal to reduce plastic waste by saying that it will express colored people, preachers and assembly sources, although the plastic supply chain poses serious health risks to black and brown societies.

In New York, defenders are fighting to pass a wide range of plastic packaging by 30 % in 12 years with a significant recycling rates and abandoning some toxic vehicles of the packages. the Reducing packaging and recycling infrastructure Bill will place fees on large companies that distribute plastic packaging, with taxpayers’ revenue benefit – a scheme called the responsibility of the expanded product.

The proposal, which must be taken this week for traffic, approved the Senate last month for the second year in a row, with the support of almost every democracy. But he faces Strong opposition Of some commercial interests and the American Chemistry Council, a pressure group representing large oil companies and chemical manufacturers such as Dupont. Efforts to respond to the bill And according to the cost stated More than $ 2 million.

In recent weeks, defenders and association employees told the Guardian newspaper that the pressure groups have focused on the black effects affecting the association, Puerto Rico, of Spanish origin, and Asian America, on the pretext that the proposed legislation will raise food prices, and thus harm colored societies that are likely to rely on food aid programs.

Claire Valdes, a member of the state association, which is part of Queens in New York City and supports the original draft law, said the efforts made to kill plastic legislation are “racist clearly”. “These companies only want to be able to continue to pay their products to exploited societies and resources without any result.”

Tactics, which you cover first before Albani Times-UnionI paid anger at Bill defenders. in letter For the state association to support the bill, religious leaders in New York said that “the narrative of companies” is “not only a liar; it’s also very insulting.”

The message says: “It is an unethical and manipulating tactic of these interests for companies to use color societies as shocks to maintain their lower lines.” “By focusing their efforts on pressing the black, Puerto Rico, Latin and Asian group, they are trying to create division and fear as no one should be.”

last letterIt was jointly sent by the New York State State Conference and Consumer reports: “We realize that representatives of the petrochemical industries, packaging and packaging have met with members of lions, Puerto Rico, of Spanish origin, raising this legislation in New York in an attempt to distort them.

Summary incinerators, which the bill tries to reduce dependence by enhancing recycling, Often it falls In color societies, where they are emitted by the supporters of toxic pollutants, they say. Plastic production, which also creates dangerous air emissions, too It hurts inconsistently The health of the black and brown Americans.

Freiman Klopot, a spokesman for the US Chemistry Council in New York, said that the proposed legislation “is not a solution to the problem of waste in New York.”

“The Administrative Coordination Committee has joined a wide alliance that has worked closely with many legislators on both sides of the corridor to highlight more effective and universal ways to reduce packaging waste,” Klopot said.

The Administrative Coordination Committee did not respond to questions about the pressure groups targeting legislators who are colored people in the efforts made to oppose the draft law.

The groups of commercial interests that oppose the bill denied that any intentions have racist motives.

Industry interests indicate a study at the University of York, which found that the original draft law will raise prices by more than $ 700 per family annually. But Bill defenders notice that the report was produced by a group Fund from the plastic lobby. They say there is no reliable evidence that policy will increase consumer prices. One report 2022 from Columbia University I found that such programs lead to only very small prices, while a 2020 Report funded by Environmental Administration in Oregon I found that the bills of the responsibility of the extended product did not raise prices in Canadian provinces.

In recent weeks, a handful of Democratic lawmakers in New York, most of them are lions, Puerto Rico, and the Legislative Assembly of Spanish and Asian origin, have supported their support behind a competitive and weaker bill, which is supported by commercial interests. It will also create the responsibility program for the expanded product, but it abandons some of the most progressive elements for the original legislation, such as the decline in plastic that companies can use and delegations placed on recycled content levels.

Petrochemical interests for them Previously Plastic reducing efforts would harm people with colors and vertical. A pressure group representing plastic bags manufacturers in 2014 The black leadership coalition is funded in New Yorkinstitution Argue Those who support fees on plastic bags may have been “and” tied “. He also worked on environmental protection advocates at Minnesota last year to cancel a policy that prevents municipalities from banning plastic bags, some The defenders told the Guardian that the commercial groups argued that the cancellation would put a burden on low -income societies. Last year, the International Council of Chemical Associations assigned a report that production caps require damage to low -income people who are not commensurate by raising the prices of products.

But at a press conference in Albani this month, he calls the original plastic limit bill He said that passes policy The Americans will benefit black and brown by helping to get rid of toxic petrochemical treatment.

“How many of us should die because of these polluted,” Sharon Lavin, the founder of the Louisiana Popular Organization in Reese Saint James. “They sacrifice us to make a profit.”

Saraha Shreista, a member of the association that represents the southeastern region of New York, which supports the original legislation, said that the “fear tactic” in the industry is working on some legislators who may be less familiar with the legislation.

She said, “Long legislators are always afraid that politics can have unexpected consequences for their voters,” adding that the opposition strategy focused on preventing the bill from being voted.

In front of the New York Association until Tuesday to vote on the proposed laws, which if passed, it will go to the ruler’s office for final approval.