the Trump administration It moves to keep the two Michigan Coal factories that emit about 45 % of the country Protective gases pollutionThe opponents say it is an indication of how the US President plans to enjoy the controversial National Energy Emergency Executive order.
Indeed, the US Energy Ministry (DOE) ordered the JH Campell Coal factory on the lake Michigan To stay open after May 31 of the closing date, while the administration is expected to extend the life of the Monroe power plant on Lake Erie, currently scheduled to start the closure in 2028.
The opponents say it is a little support in Michigan, and the interesters may cost hundreds of millions of dollars, and it is ideological. State facilities said that she did not ask the plants to stay on the Internet, and Trump administration He did not communicate with the stakeholders before the matter, according to a spokesman for the Michigan Public Service Committee (MPSC), which organizes the facilities and runs the state network, to the Guardian newspaper.
“The modern arrangement is unnecessary … it will increase the cost of power for homes and companies in Michigan and through the Middle West,” MPSC President Dan Skrips said in a statement. “We currently produce more energy in Michigan than required. As a result, there is no current energy emergency in Michigan or [the regional US grid]”
Huge facilities and aging also release high levels of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and particles in the air. Meanwhile, their coal ponds rooted arsenic, lead, lithium, radium and sulfate in local drinking water and great lakes. Monroe power plant is responsible for more arsenic water pollution than any other power plant in the United States.
In a statement to The Guardian, the Ministry of Energy told The Guardian that the plan was about the reliability of the network, adding: “The suspension of Baseload energy sources like coal factories would put the reliability of our network systems.
“This administration is committed to guaranteeing access to reliable energy, reasonable and safe prices, not dependent on whether the sun rises or wind strikes,” added a spokesman.
However, consumers energy He said in May it does not need to keep the coal factory online to meet energy needs. She recently bought a near gas factory, and began building widely renewable facilities.
The independent system operator in the middle of the continent, which maintains the regional network in 15 states, issued a report stating that although there are some risks of energy drops in the summer months, it is low, and “adequate resources are available to maintain reliability.”
This may be a theater for a lawsuit by the Michigan Public Prosecutor, Dana Nessel, who said in May she might sue the matter of keeping the Campbell factory open, and described Trump’s emergency “fabricated”.
Jean Ocunel, the Sierra Sierra Energy Club, said that the Campbell factory will initially remain open for 90 days, but the request is expected to be renewed.
The Climate Law in Michigan requires 100 % clean energy for the utilities by 2040. The energy has been consumers, which has owned the Campbell factory, since 2021 plans to close the factory as required in the state’s energy plan. The company said that the closure of the Campbell factory will provide price perpetrators about $ 600 million by 2040.
After promoting the newsletter
O’Connell said the factory was largely closed for several days before reopening it at the end of May. She noted that many employees have already found other jobs, and that the purchase of charcoal immediately is much more expensive than buying months ago, as is the criteria.
O’Connell said that the administration is expensive and planned, and it has no meaning on the energy of consumers or its customers.
“This will cost the price perpetrators a lot of money,” she added.
The opponents say that the Trump administration plans are inconsistent with the market forces. Gas and renewable energy are generally cheaper and cause less pollution. Moreover, the country’s facilities are planning to reduce the generation of coal More than 8gw By the end of the year, according to the US Energy Information Department.
Ocunel said it looks an ideological step without any basis in the needs of the population or the energy market.
“This is part of their goal to get rid of renewable energy sources and restore fossil fuels.”
