Mita won a major legal ruling on a lawsuit for publishing rights, which was submitted by 13 authors claiming that the company illegally trained artificial intelligence systems for their work without permission. On Wednesday, Judge Vince Chapria I ruled in favor of Mita, saying The brief judgment has the right to defend the fair use to claim that copying the books of these plaintiffs for use, as LLM training data was violated.
However, the judge also referred to some weaknesses in the ecosystem of the Big Tech AI and Meta Prosecutions that defend her actions as a fair use. Judge Chapria said: “This ruling does not fall into the proposal that the use of dead materials protected by copyrights to train its language models is legal.”
“He only stands for the suggestion that these prosecutors presented the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record to support the correct registry.” The ruling follows the victory of the fair use of the anthropologist, which he won from a separate federal judge yesterday, and who tried to train his models on copies of law purchased from books It is fair use.
Judge Chapria says that two authors about the authors about fair use were “clear losers:” Llama’s ability to reproduce excerpts from the text from their books and that dead use their work to train AI models without mitigating their ability to license their training for training. The judge wrote: “Either can only generate a sufficient text from the plaintiffs’ books to the issue, and the plaintiffs are not entitled to obtain a market to license their business as Amnesty International training agencies.”
Prosecutors have not done enough for a “likely argument to be a winner” that copying a dead will create “a product that is likely to immerse the market with similar businesses, causing the market to reduce,” according to Judge Chapria. The Anthropier also discussed, saying that Judge William Alsup has been aside for concerns about the damage that could “be” caused “in the market for the business on which he was trained.
