Washington-An official at the Ministry of Justice pride in a special Republican gathering that the Trump administration managed to kill the Texas Law, which gave immigrants not documented in education “in six hours” through coordination with the Public Prosecutor of Texas Ken Pakston, according to a registration obtained by NBC news.
On June 4, the Ministry of Justice A lawsuit against Texas On the Texas Dream Law, then it was presented quickly a Common movement with Texas The judge’s demand to declare the law is unconstitutional and to clarify Texas permanently from law enforcement. On the same day, The judge did.
External organizations sought to nullify the ruling on Tuesday, on the pretext that the Ministry of Justice and the Buckston office “colluded to secure an agreed judicial order” and participate in an inappropriate “Legal dance design“To get the desired result.
Speaking to the General Assembly of Republican Bar Association, a day after his rapid victory for the court, it seemed that the Deputy Prosecutor, Abhishek Campley, appeared to confirm this.
“We were only filed yesterday, we filed a lawsuit against Texas, and he took the decree of approval on the same day, or was sentenced to approval, and it was granted after hours,” Campley told the participants. “And what he did, because we were able to obtain the line of communication and speaking in advance, a law that represented a problem for the state for 24 years, we got rid of it within six hours.”
Campley, who was previously working for the Kansas Public Prosecutor Chris Cobash, added that the Ministry of Justice has “good relations” with the state lawyer, which allows her to “accomplish matters.”
Campley also said that the second Trump administration “learns how to be rational”, according to sound.
“I think this was the biggest criticism of the first time in the Trump administration – there were a lot of lost opportunities to provide the federal government’s authority for the things that we appreciated and never occurred,” said Campley. “But this time we brought a lot of people from World Ag State who did this type of litigation, and know how to do so and did so.”
Pakston’s office did not respond to the request for comment.
A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice did not oppose that Campley made the data and said that it was a “beautiful standard” for the lawyer of the Ministry of Justice to notify the state prosecutor of federal lawsuits early. He pointed to the policy of the Ministry of Justice that the provision of a fair warning to the state’s general lawyer before submitting lawsuits.Solve things before litigation“
The Ministry of Justice filed the lawsuit presented to the American boycott judge, Red O’Connor, George W. Bush’s candidate in the Whitchita Fols Division in the northern province of Texas, whose trial has become a destination for conservative litigants looking for favorable results.
The attacking democracy groups, the Aclu Foundation in Texas and the National Center for Immigration Law on Tuesday applied on behalf of La Unión Del Pueblo Entero, a union founded by Sisar Chavez. They argued that the sequence of events “compels one conclusion: the United States and the general lawyer in Texas colluded with the results of the case in advance.”
The movement added: “The founders have not designed our hostile system of injustice between the common parties. The system demands the opposition, the argument, and the deliberations-and not the approval ceremonies disguised as a judge.”
Sky Periman, President and CEO of Democracy striker, criticized Paxon for not defending the dream law in Texas from the two parties, which was approved by the legislative body and signed state governor Rick Perry more than two decades ago. She indicated that the legislative body had refused to cancel the law.
Buckston recently announced that he will challenge US Senator John Corn in the Republican preliminary elections next year-Republican Party Battle against Government Acidity Between two men who were competing for years And competition for President Donald Trump’s interest.
“Instead of defending the Texas Law … Pactin Prosecutor Paxon colluded with the Trump Vance administration to try to eliminate the law through the courts,” Periman said in a statement. “This maneuver is a misuse of the courts. If the Prosecutor does not defend Paxon from Texas, we will be committed to ensuring that this satirical step is opposed, defending the Texas Dreams Law, and supporting the courage of our customers.”
Karl Tobias of the University of Richmond Law Faculty of Law that the chiefs of parliament in Texas and the Senate should be concerned that Pakston’s office refused to defend the state law.
Tobias said: “The entire American hypothesis to settle the case is that you have people with conflicting interests, and this is why they are in court to start.” “But of course, we know for political reasons, they may not do that.”
Sacica Brakash from the Faculty of Law at the University of Virginia, which has I looked for the duty of the state lawyer for defense The laws in all fifty states said that more public lawyers are ready to say that the laws are unconstitutional.
“Part of the reason they are more willing to do this is a political reason, as they want to be a Sinter or a ruler,” he said.
Brakash said that in all the presidential and democratic presidential administrations, there was a tendency to stability recently when the litigant is supported by the administration. The departments also want a settlement linking the next president to the policies supported by their parties.
“In my opinion, it is not a good way to operate a railway, whether Biden or Trump does,” said Brakash.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration is suing more countries to the state’s education policies for uncomfortable students. Ministry of Justice A lawsuit against Kentucky last week Its policy of giving tuition fees within the state to illegal immigrants. On Wednesday, the Ministry of Justice Filed a lawsuit against Minnesota On its law it does the same.
In both cases, the Ministry of Justice referred to the result in the Texas case as justified.
