NHS hospital funding in England to be tied to patient ratings, ministers say | Health policy
Money for hospitals in England The ministers, as one of the health heads in charge of implementing the 10 -year government plan to judge NHS in the country warned that one of the health heads assigned to implement the 10 -year government plan for the country’s ovens plan has faced an existential threat that was not connected to the public.
The procedure, according to which health care providers can lose a percentage of their financing if patients are unhappy, is part of the package that the Minister of Health hopes to stimulate investment in services that can prevent the need for hospital visits – and to encourage more patients listening to patients.
But the doctors expressed concern about the risks of the suggestion to perform surgery NHS With a sharp tool, instead of a required scalpel.
Under the proposals, which were first reported in the Times, patients should be asked if they want to continue to care for their service to the service they used, or if the percentage should go to a regional box instead. According to the Times, about 10 % of “standard payment rates” can be transferred if the patient is unhappy.
“This will be presented as there was a busy record in the very bad service and the evidence that the patients are not listened to,” the section for health Social welfare said on Saturday, adding that it will be operated at first as a trial.
But Matthew Taylor, CEO of the NHS Federation, said: “None of our members raised this idea with us as a way to improve care, and as far as we know, there is no other health care system that is currently adopting this model.”
He said: “The patient’s experience is determined more than their individual interaction with the doctor, and unless it is not designed and evaluated very carefully, there is a risk that service providers are punished for more regular problems.”
Other measures are designed to help treat people in society – before they need hospital. Minister of Health, Wes StreetHe said: “If patients are not able to get a GP date, which costs NHS about 40 pounds, they end up in A& E, which costs up to 400 pounds.”
This came, as the new NHS president in England said that the service “built mechanisms to preserve the audience away.” “We have made it very difficult, and perhaps we were all at the end. I got a relative in the hospital, so you are ringing a number on a wing that no one will answer at all. The suite writer only works on nine to five, or they are busy doing other things; the GP practice is floundered every morning,” Sir Jim Makki told Telegraph.
Maki warned that the separation between NHS services and the public may completely lead to the loss of public health service. “The great anxiety is: If we do not adhere to that, and we do not deal with it at a pace, we will lose the population. If we lose the population, we lose NHS.”
The street said on Wednesday that the 10 -year government plan also aims to “address anyone More accurate health inequality“He claimed that he was not equal to access to information and selection when it comes to health care.
“We have to redirect it in one way or another, think about how to find people who need us, and how we stop thinking:” it will be pain in the donkey if it appears because I am very busy, “Maki said, and instead, we think about how to discover what you need and get it.”
