Health care organizations continue to face the ongoing challenges related to the rotation of doctors – driven in a large part of exhaustion and dissatisfaction with electronic health records.
Beyond that human losses, the financial repercussions of rotation are great for healthcare organizations. The average cost of replacement of the nurse is about $ 56,300, as shown in a Modern report On the topic of Klas, while the doctor’s replacement account can range between $ 500,000 and $ 1 million.
Sandra Johnson is the first vice president of customer services in electronic health records, revenue management, and an analysis seller clinic. We recently asked it about the basic criteria that service providers should take into account when evaluating EHRS to cause fatigue. Among other visions, it highlighted the main importance of the systems designed by practicing doctors.
Q: Nearly two decades since they are everywhere in health care, why are electronic health records still contribute to the fatigue of doctors? What happens for a piece of technology to expel many service providers from their jobs?
A. Electronic health records contribute to fatigue through multiple interconnected factors, with design problems and ease of use. Many EHR systems are not intuitive, which increases cognitive load and frustration among healthcare providers.
The requirements of the extensive documents, despite the necessity of compliance and bills, lead to more doctors in the administrative tasks than actual care of patients. This basic shift away from their basic mission of helping patients is an important source of functional satisfaction.
Technology often forces doctors to focus on screen time more than the patient’s interaction, creating an interruption in the relationship of the doctor/patient. In addition, doctors often face “tiredness in alert” from excessive system notifications, and the lack of inter -operation between different EHR systems leads to repeated documentation and constant alteration between multiple platforms.
These issues collect from the administrative burden and reduce the time available to care for patients.
Many of this stems from the original development of EHRS as invoices instead of Clinical workflow tools. While the requirements of documentation and filter are necessary, the systems were not initially designed with the clinical workflow.
This imbalance between technology and practical needs has created a position where doctors – who entered health care to help patients and create a meaningful effect – in finding themselves spend excessive time in technology management and ending endless administrative tasks instead of providing care.
Q: What are the financial effects of doctors’ rotation of health care providers?
A. the Financial influence of doctors’ rotation on healthcare organizations It can be large and multi -sided. The most urgent costs come from employment and training new appointments, which require a large cash investment in addition to a large time and resources to properly train parent employees.
These expenses extend beyond merely employment costs to include the resources needed to provide comprehensive training programs.
Organizations may expect significant losses in productivity during the transition period. New appointments require time to cope with their roles and learn the EHR system, during which they work with reduced efficiency.
In addition, the productivity of the current employees is affected as they must devote time to train new colleagues while maintaining the responsibilities of their patient care. This dual impact on productivity can have significant financial effects on the organization.
Besides these direct costs, high rotational rates can negatively affect the quality of care and patient experience. When experienced doctors who work well together, they can disrupt established care patterns and affect quality standards.
The patient’s satisfaction may decrease if there is a frequent rotation rate, as it can eat confidence and continuity of care. These factors can eventually affect the organization’s reputation and financial performance through a decrease in patient retention and potential effects on quality -based compensation.
Q: For the doctors who initially thought about leaving, but in the end they chose to stay, a decrease in exhaustion appeared as a major cause of their decision, according to Klas. The second most influential factor was to improve training in the use of electronic health records. Please clarify these two factors.
A. A decrease in fatigue The improved EHR training represents decisive factors in keeping doctors, especially when institutions invest in technology that can be implemented quickly, upgrade smoothly, automated workflow and reduce administrative burden.
When healthcare organizations prove a commitment to tiredness through technology and improvements in the process, this shows that doctors of their concerns are hearing and treating, which may significantly affect their decision to stay.
The training aspect exceeds the movement and implementation in the statute. EHR training programs focus on improving continuous improvement and workflow, helping doctors to discover enhancement features of efficiency and shortcuts that can simplify their daily tasks.
This continuous educational approach guarantees that doctors currently remain through system updates and learn to take advantage of the new features that can improve their workflow efficiency.
What makes these training programs in particular is their focus on the workflow for specialization instead of using public order. By allocating training in individual specializations and specific clinical needs, organizations help doctors increase the capabilities of the system in their field of exercise.
This specialized approach, in addition to continuous investment in improving and improving workflow, helps to create an environment as doctors feel support and equipping to provide effective care for patients during the management of their administrative responsibilities.
Q: What are the basic criteria that health care providers should take into account to avoid fatigue when evaluating electronic health records systems?
A. When evaluating EHR systems To reduce the risk of fatigue, the ability to use appears as the basic consideration. The intuitive and easy interface for use that is in line with clinical work is necessary to reduce the time and effort needed to learn and use the system effectively.
This should be associated with powerful interim operation capabilities that allow smooth integration with other systems and devices, which reduces frequent planning and facilitating effective information.
The customization capabilities are another important factor, as the system must be adaptive to both specialized needs and individual user preferences. This flexibility must be supported through strong and continuous training programs that ensure that users can effectively use the system and adapt to new features over time.
In addition, the system must include counterfeit nutrition mechanisms that allow doctors to contribute to its development, and ensure the meeting and improvements that meet the clinical needs in the real world.
The reliability and performance of the system cannot be overlooked, as technical and technical issues can significantly affect patient care and doctors. Modern EHR systems must also take advantage of artificial intelligence and automation to reduce administrative burdens, especially for routine tasks.
The ideal system must prove a commitment to continuous innovation, with regular updates and improvements that respond to user notes and meet advanced health care needs, while maintaining the strong and reliable performance that doctors can rely on.
Follow Bill Hit coverage on LinkedIn: Bill Seuiki
Email him: bsiwicki@himss.org
Information technology healthcare is a HIMSS media publication
Watch now: long -term care, communication role and supervisor operations
