Pentagon says US strikes set back Iran nuclear program ‘one to two years’ | US military
The chief speaker of the Ministry of Defense said at a press conference on Wednesday that the Pentagon collected intelligence materials indicating that the Iranian nuclear program may restore nearly one to two years as a result of the American strikes in three main facilities last month.
The spokesperson, Sean Bernil, reiterated Donald Trump’s claim that Iran’s main nuclear sites have been fully destroyed, although he had not provided more details about the origin of the assessments that exceeded that they came from within the Ministry of Defense.
“We have deteriorated their program for a year to two years,” Bernil said at a press conference held in the Pentagon. “At least, INTEL reviews within the section evaluation.”
Parnell’s strike was a more estimated estimate of Trump’s assurances about the level of destruction. A report of the low -confident defense intelligence agency (DIA) based on early assessments, that the Iran program had been appointed for several months.
The advanced image of the severe damage to the Iranian nuclear program comes as American intelligence agencies continued to take out new assessments, using materials indicating that the centrifuge in the main FordOW enrichment site has been destroyed even if it was unclear whether the facility itself has been assembled.
Trump advisers used these materials, which include the use of the video taken from B-2 bombers to confirm the trauma simulation models that destroy the centrifuge and other Israeli Intel from outside Ford, to defend Trump’s assurances, two people familiar with the matter said.
It is important to the damage to the Iranian nuclear program and the fate of the country’s enriched uranium stored in the country – which can quickly turn into a raw nuclear weapon – because it can dictate the period when the program was seized.
The head of the United Nations Nuclear Energy Agency said on Sunday that Iran could produce enriched uranium within a few months.
“They can have within months, and I would like to say that some centrifugal waterfalls revolve and produce enriched uranium,” said Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), adding that “Iran is a very developed country with regard to nuclear technology … You cannot back away from the knowledge you have or the capabilities you have.”
The first DIA evaluation in the Pentagon, which was based on information more than 24 hours after strikes, I mentioned the guardian beforeIt was found that the damage could range from Iran capable of restarting the facility with the new centrifuge to having to abandon it for future use.
The DIA report evaluated the program has been returned several months ago, although this conclusion was made at the alleged “low confidence” level, reflecting the early nature of evaluation and intelligence agencies uncertainty with the initial conclusions.
Trump’s advisers retracted the DIA report and said in particular that the destruction of the centrifuge alone means that they had removed a major component of Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons and means that the nuclear program has been delayed by years.
The battles on the conclusions of intelligence agencies at the center of the US foreign policy decisions for decades were warnings about the Iraqi weapons programs used by the Bush administration to justify the 2003 invasion, which was found to be a liar, to claim that the Chinese laboratory leak was responsible for Kovid.
However, a lot of controversy over American strikes has been created by Trump claiming to be “blurring” Iranian nuclear sites, which no intelligence agency has been repeated directly because it is not a description used in intelligence assessments.
Verification of the damage became more difficult on Wednesday, after Iran entered a new law to suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency. Iran accused the nuclear nuclear agency of biased with Western countries and providing justification for Israeli air strikes.
A Foreign Ministry spokesman described the move as “unacceptable” and said that Iran must fully comply with the obligations of the Nuclear Non -Proliferation Treaty, including by providing the International Atomic Energy Agency with information about unpopular nuclear materials and providing unrestricted access to any newly announced enrichment facility.
