Experts said that the exact size of plastic and “chemicals forever” in the school uniform should be restricted, because they urge peers to support two amendments to a decisive bill.
The draft law of children’s welfare and schools, which mainly applies to England and Wales and is in the committee stage in House of LordsIt is about to present a new list about the cost of the unified school elements, as well as the number of unified elements with brands that schools can require students.
But the emerging evidence of environmental risks, human health of artificial fibers and PFAS “chemicals forever”, which are used as stain and water -resistant factors, led to concerns about fabrics and chemicals used in their manufacture. PFAS, or individual and polyvorauclele materials, is the term umbrella A family of thousands of chemicals that decompose very slowly. It was some Associated with health problems Including high cholesterol in cholesterol, fertility issues, immune system disorders, kidney disease, birth defects, some cancer, and A group of other serious health problems.
“What we failed to realize is the effect of the cocktail, which is the fact that all of us, especially our children, are subjected to fine plastic and nanoplastic,” said Natalie Bennett, the counterpart of the Green Party, which supported both amendments.
“We are exposed to PfasWe are exposed to pesticides. The level of all these things is rising all the time. “
Ms. Bennett added: “The phrase” the effect of the cocktail “comes from the river activists who began to focus on the environmental impact of this. But in reality, in reality [this is] What happens to human bodies. “
The amendment requires 202 A to the children’s invoice approximately an immediate prohibition on the use of PFAs in school uniforms, and a condition for manufacturers to provide a passport of a digital product that narrates chemicals.
202b modification calls for action within 12 months to the uniform that can “endanger or safety people [or] Unreasonable public health or environmental health risk “, with a special focus on artificial fibers.
In 2021, artificial fibers constituted 64 % of the total global fiber production production, but there are no clear data on the percentage of polyester, nylon or other synthetic materials.
Stories indicate that most of the uniforms are made of artificial materials, with alternatives made of natural fibers that are marketed as exceptions.
There was a long concern about the effect of artificial fibers on the environment, as those derived from petrochemical continued for thousands of years and get rid of billions of plastic fibers in ecosystems.
But the most recent research showed these fine fibers, which are defined as artificial fibers less than 5 mm, are also infiltrated into human bodies, where their studies were identified in Human bloodand semenand Lungsand Breast milkand Bone marrowand Placentaand Testicles and Brains.
Scientists have found that synthetic fibers should not be eliminated, or even exposed to the pressure of the washing machine cycle, to start getting rid of microscopic fibers, with Clothing clothes up to 400 fibers per gram of fabric In just 20 minutes of regular corrosion.
Bennett said: “It is clear that this is breathing.” “Thus you know, you nominate the bus in your jacket, and you may take a large plastic material, directly to your lungs, and perhaps in your bloodstream. Of course, as you know, you touch it and then touch your mouth and you can also eat it orally.”
After promoting the newsletter
The health effects of the plastic fibers remain unconfirmed, but initial research indicated that it may increase the risk of developing different conditions such as Oxidal stress or cardiovascular disease.
Bennett added: “My wider framework is the limits of planets … One of them is the alleged new entities, which for my conclusion are pesticides, pharmaceutical preparations and plastic materials. We have crossed the planetary borders of the new entities.
“Thus is the place where the argument of the entire cocktail effect comes, as you know, we call this planet, we are on a poisoned planet, and we call our bodies.”
“Most parents may not realize that the uniform that their children should wear may be treated with a mixture of chemicals forever, which is hardly impossible to tell the mark,” said Dr. David Santilo, the chief scientist in Greenpis research laboratories.
“The work in the school uniform should go along with a broader ban on the use of any PFAS in any woven, so that this is not a lottery of exposure on the basis of what your child wears. There is no place for chemicals forever in daily consumer clothes and must be disposed of in all specialized basic uses in specialized work clothes.”
“The toxic chemicals in the school uniform are another example of the reason for our need for the strongest laws of chemicals. Before Britain’s exit from the European Union, the United Kingdom was parts of the world’s golden normative system to regulate chemicals, which restricted or banned hundreds of materials associated with health concerns such as our cancer, but our opponents are largely weak.
“The government must adhere to the European Union’s standards in the plan to improve the binding environment legally, and it must prohibit the use of these harmful chemicals completely to protect people and nature.”
