Claim this Lucy Litty Certainly namarians with insulin have no “scientific justification at all”, and there is a “very strong level of reasonable suspicion” about the condemnation, according to a study author of 100 pages on the case.
Professor Jeff Chase, one of the world’s most prominent experts on the influence of insulin on children before the term, told the Guardian that it was “very unlikely” that anyone runs potentially fatal doses for a second of infants.
The prosecution told the jury in the Letby trial that there may be “undoubtedly that this poisoning” and that “these were not accidents” based on the results of blood sugar in children.
However, a detailed analysis of the medical records of the infants by senior international experts in newborn and biomedics diseases concluded that the data provided to the jury was “inconsistent” with poisoning.
The 35-year-old nurse is working on 15 benefits from 15 years in prison after being convicted of killing seven children and an attempt to kill seven others-including an attempt to kill with excessive doses of insulin-at Chester Hospital in the northwest England.
The Criminal Cases Review Committee (CCRC), which verifies the potential abortion of justice, has started this week to review the case on the day that includes 14 international experts He found no evidence From killing or deliberate harm.
Sir David Davis, the prominent conservative deputy who supports the call of letby, described it as “one of the main injustice in the modern era.”
Public Prosecutor Nick Johnson Ki CC told the jury in a Libyan trial that the nurse “undoubtedly” poisoned the two baby boys known as the child 6 and the 12 -year -old child for eight months by wearing their nutritional bags with insulin.
The prosecution said that the test results that showed low blood sugar and insulin levels “abnormally”, with very low levels of peptide C, means that “it must have been given or taken” artificial insulin has not been determined.
However, a new 100 -page report issued by Chis, a distinguished professor of biological engineering at Canterbury University in New Zealand, and British chemical engineering expert Helen Shannon, says Lu Blood sugar levels are “uncommon” in infants before the period.
The study adds that insulin poisoning was likely to lead to much lower levels of potassium and glucose, which shows children’s records, and indicates that they did not show any symptoms of severe insulin poisoning, such as seizures or irregular heartbeat.
The report, which refers to more than 250 scientific papers, is reviewed by the peer, and is scheduled to be sent to CCRC within weeks. Forensic medicine.
In the first interview in the UK newspaper since a summary of one page of the report this week, Chis said that there are “a number of harmless interpretations” of the deterioration of the two infants, who survived.
He told the Guardian newspaper: “I am not here to say whether Lucy was a killer, or insulin poisoning, or she is guilty or not guilty.
“I am here to say that the evidence provided – and its interpretation in particular – has more than the one explanation provided, and that you cannot assume poisoning in view of the reasonable possibility of all the rest. I say that there is a very strong level of reasonable suspicion.”
Shannon said that there was no scientific justification at all “to claim the claim that” there is no doubt that this poisoning. “
She said that the immunological assay tests used by scientists in Liverpool clinical laboratories were unreliable in the discovery of artificial insulin because antibodies can cause interference.
The second, more than forensic, the test should have been used to check the result. She said: “I think the issue of prosecution was absent from many of the relevant decisive sciences.” “They only presented part of the story.”
The insulin charges are very important as they were presented as the strongest evidence of the harm of someone deliberately, as it depended on blood tests.
Letby defense lawyer Benjamin Maires KC told the jury that “he could not say what happened” to the two children and was unable to dispute the results of the blood test, as samples were disposed of.
In a very big moment During its evidenceLetby accepted the assertion that someone must have been allowed to deliberately children, but that was not for her. Experts who are now working for her defense say it was not eligible to give such an opinion and that it should not be considered a major recognition.
The trial judge was told, Mr. Judge Gus K. The jury is that if they were sure that the children were harmed on the unit – which seemed to me to Tibi – they can use this belief to inform their decision on other charges against the previous nurse.
The jury reached the rulings of consensus on guilt in relation to all of the concerns of insulin – the only crimes that were agreed upon – and re -decisions days before reaching other conclusions.
A CPS spokesman said: “Two jury and three judges from the Court of Appeal reviewed a large number of different evidences against Lucy Litteni. He was convicted on 15 separate charges after two separate experiences of the jury,” a CPS spokesman said.
“In May 2024, the Appeal Court rejected the letby leave to appeal from all reasons, and her argument refused that the expert prosecution was defective.”
