The Ministry of Justice said on Monday that it would review the condemnation of the former writer of Misa Province, Colorado, who was He was convicted of the state’s charge last summer It is tampered with voting machines under their control in a failed attempt to prove that they have been used to manipulate the 2020 elections against President Trump.
The decision was the recent examples of the Ministry of Justice in light of Mr. Trump’s control that seeks to use its powers to support those who acted on his behalf and chasing those who criticized or opposed it. He also played in the president’s efforts to rewrite the date of his efforts to cancel the election results.
Three weeks ago, former writer, Tina Peters, who was He was sentenced to nine years in prison Regarding the tampering with the state’s elections, she submitted a long request at the Federal Provincial Court in Denver a truly judgment that she received in August at the end of a trial in Grand Great.
However, in a sudden step, Yaakov M. Roth, Acting Prosecutor of the Civil Department of the Ministry of Justice, presented a summary of the court known as the name Statement statement On Monday, he announced that “reasonable concerns have been raised about various aspects of Mrs. Peters.” In the deposit, Mr. Roth said that the federal judge who received the petition of Mrs. Peters this month should give him a “quick and self -study.”
Mr. Roth said that the Ministry of Justice was concerned, among other matters, about the “exceptional long sentence” imposed by the judge on Mrs. Peters in Grand Genkery. He also asked about the state’s decision to refuse to sponsor her because she resumes its conviction as “arbitrary or unreasonable.”
Mr. Roth wrote that the review of Mrs. Peters was part of a larger examination of cases “throughout the country due to the violations of the criminal justice.” He added that the Peter’s case has been examined by an executive order issued by Mr. Trump seeking to end the “federal government weapon.”
It is still unclear, what is the permanent effect that the Ministry of Justice review may make the case of Mrs. Peters on the procedure. But Mr. Roth explained in the court papers that the evaluation was taking place to determine whether the prosecution was “directed towards political pain more than pursuing actual justice.”
The Ministry of Justice does not have any authority to condemn the state directly. But its deposit in pressure on a federal court to interfere in the case was a remarkable intervention in this matter.
Dan Robinstein, the lawyer for the Misa Province, who obtained a conviction against Mrs. Peters, said on Monday evening, until the papers of the Sayyid Roth Court had no idea that the Ministry of Justice was considering checking the case of Mrs. Peters about the alleged political bias.
Moreover, he said, no one of the administration has contacted before depositing to express his concern over the case.
“I am pleased to have a conversation with anyone in the administration regarding the motives and expectations that our society had when they wanted an overwhelming majority to bring this criminal procedure,” said Mr. Robinstein.
The Grand Grakhen jury found that Mrs. Peters is guilty of seven charges stemming from her efforts to violate a voting machine made by Dominins in the months that followed that Mr. Trump lost the elections to Joseph R. Biden Junior.
The jury decided that Mrs. Peters helped west of obtaining an unauthorized access to the device in May 2021 and to obtain information that was later announced at a conspiracy event held to undermine the defeat of Mr. Trump.
At the ruling session in October, Judge Matthew d. Barrett of Mrs. Peters from the bench, and told her that he was imposing a severe punishment for her because she had repeatedly advanced with false allegations about Mr. Trump’s defeat, and that she was well, she became a celebrity among those who denied the race.
“You are not a hero. Judge Barrett said:” He has abused your position, and you are Charlatan, “adding,” You can only lie to the same ease that you breathe. “
Since the re -election of Mr. Trump, the Ministry of Justice has faced criticism of its behavior in a number of cases, which led to the resignation of sudden prosecutors.
The senior prosecutors in New York and Washington this month stepped down in response to the administration’s efforts to reject the issue of corruption against Mayor Eric Adams from New York.
Similar, The head of the criminal department at the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Washington recently resigned After she rejected a request from her president, Ed Martin, to freeze the assets of a government contractor, saying that she had insufficient evidence to do so.
Mr. Martin was also quietly Payment to provide evidence against Senator Chuck Schumer From New York, the Democratic Leader, to a major federal jury on his comments on the Supreme Court judges in 2020, according to people who have knowledge of the situation. One of these people said that the Ministry of Justice officials had so far refused the request.
