10 has not been informed that he may face FrontBench resignations if you follow plans to freeze some of the advantages of disability – a step that requires a vote in Parliament.
The government has been told that more than one minister and parliamentarians can resign if there are no 10 who choose to freeze a disability subsidy known as PIP Payment (PIP) for some demands.
The Labor Party deputies were particularly concerned about rejection, whether in the private or public sector, by the Prime Minister and others in the Council of Ministers to abide by not helping the disabled persons who are more vulnerable to the disabled who cannot work.
“He will protect those who cannot work”, but they will not say they will not be affected by changes. Sources close to Liz Kendall suggested the work and pensions that were trying to reassure the deputies on that front.
A number of new deputies who spoke to the Guardian said they do not believe that the government can move forward in plans to freeze interest for some demands in view of the reverse reaction scale.
The deputies who met the director of Kiir Starmer, Claire Reynolds, and Economic Adviser, Rav Athar, said at No. 10 this week that they were repeatedly emphasized for that. Fights of the deputies They were taken on board. The presentations to the deputies did not include any details about the proposed changes, which some have said have caused more anxiety.
Among those who spoke at meetings, dozens of Starmerite deputies from the new income, who told No. 10 that the reaction was “much worse than [that over] Winter fuel payments.
It is understood that many senior ministers expressed their concerns in the cabinet about the size of the rebellion, including Deputy Prime Minister, Angela Rainer, Ed Milband and Lucy Powell.
At the meeting, which Rainer, Minister of Justice, Shabana Mahmoud, and Minister of Interior, Evit Cooper, described by raising the impact of spending discounts on their sections and what this means to services. Their spokesperson had no comment.
Rachel Reeves, Chancellor, defended Attempts to change the social welfare system Friday, saying that “it is quite clear that the current system does not work for anyone.”
“It does not work with people who need support, and does not work to make people work so that more people can achieve their potential, and does not work for the taxpayer when the luxury bill increases with billions of pounds in the next few years,” BBC told the BBC.
“Therefore, we need to get a grip. We need to spend more on the national defense, but we need to reform our general services, and we need to reform our broken social care system.”
Suggested changes that cause the greatest anxiety among deputies is plans to freeze some PIP and change PIP standards, and a potential reduction in global credit for those who are unable to work-who is likely to strike people who suffer from mental health conditions in particular, as well as those with long-term conditions.
One of the deputy said: “Everyone is very uncomfortable with the idea of blanket cuts, as he will get those with multiple sclerosis and dementia,” one of the deputy said. “It seems that those who make presentations are really tense, so there are no details about politics but a lot of nervousness, which means that they know it will be bad but will not tell you.”
Another deputy said that the various factions between the Parliamentary Party wanted to gather to oppose the various changes.
The change most likely to find resignation is the freezing of PIP, which requires preliminary legislation. The resignations will be more likely among the beginning roles, such as private parliamentarians, although a number of novice ministers are among those concerned.
After promoting the newsletter
The green paper that determines the changes will be published later next week – it was returned from Monday when the final agreement has been eliminated.
In front of the ministers until March 21 to submit their final offers to the budget responsibility office before the consultant’s spring statement, although it is not likely that the Supervisory Authority will take into account many changes that do not contain specific savings.
Kendall has already obtained a billion pounds of a billion pounds to help restore people to work, but the deputies hope that more diligence can be agreed.
One of the deputy said: “It does not help us tell us that we are presenting the moral issue of reform, but at the same time he is transferred to do so at the appropriate time to show the spring.” It undermines an ethical idea. It makes it just saving money. “
A government source said that it is unlikely to change the main measures that were agreed upon, but he said that there could still be “adjustments about the edges.”
Some representatives of the Labor Party who attended the discussions at Downing Street said they believed that the number 10 was listening to fears, even if the cabinet officials were hesitating to make changes.
One of them said: “They finally recognized the level of concern about this issue and know the future of the party’s unity in this way.” “We, as a party and a government, need to give people a helping hand at work.”
In response to a question about the cabinet warning reports about the discounts, Starmer’s deputy spokesman said he could not “enter the details of the cabinet discussions” and defended the planned discounts.
He said: “The system we inherited will swallow more taxpayer money and leave more people trapped in unemployment and lack of activity.” “This is not bad for the economy, it is bad for people as well, and for this reason this government will put plans to reform the health and disability system soon to support those who can work to do so, while protecting those who cannot, put spending on social care on a more sustainable path so that we can open growth.”
