Senate commercial Republicans maintained a ten -year endowment of Amnesty International’s laws in the state in Their latest version of them The huge budget package of President Donald Trump. An increasing number of lawmakers and civil society groups warns that its wide language can put the consumer protection on the cutting block.
Republicans who support this ruling, which has been wiped as part of the “beautiful bill of bill”, says it will help ensure that artificial intelligence companies are not stumbled due to a complex set of regulations. But opponents warn that if they survive the vote and the Congress that may prohibit it, major technology companies can be exempt from the state’s legal handrails for years, without any promise of federal standards.
“What this endowment does is to prevent every state in the country from the existence of basic regulations to protect workers and protect consumers,” MP Rowa Khanna (D-CA), whose region of Silicon Valley includes. freedom In an interview. It warns that as it is written, the language included in the package of reconciling the advanced budget in the House of Representatives can restrict the laws of states that try to organize social media companies, prevent discrimination in the rent of algorithms, or reduce the depths that may mislead consumers and voters. “This will basically give free companies to develop artificial intelligence in any way they want, and to develop automatic decisions without protecting consumers, workers and children.”
“The only certain thing … is that it goes beyond artificial intelligence”
The limits of what the endowment can be covered is unclear – and opponents say this is the point. Jonathan Walter, the chief political consultant at the Driving Conference on Human Rights and Human Rights, says: “The language of prohibition in making mechanical decisions is so wide that we cannot be 100 percent surely sure of the laws of the states that you can touch,” says Jonathan Walter, Senior Political Consultant at the Command Conference on Human Rights and Human Rights. “But the only certain thing, and he feels that there are at least some consensus on the consensus, is that it goes beyond artificial intelligence.”
This can include accuracy and independent tests required for facial recognition forms in states such as Colorado and Washington, in addition to aspects of vast data privacy in several states. and Analysis by a group of invitation from non -profit artificial intelligence The Americans found the responsible innovation (ARI) that a law focuses on social media such as New York.Stop exploiting summaries for addiction to children“It can be unintentionally canceled from the ruling. The Director of State Participation for Democracy and Technology, Travis Hall, says in a statement that the text of the House of Representatives will prevent” the basic consumer protection laws from progressing to artificial intelligence systems. “Even state governments restrictions on their own use of Amnesty International can be banned.
The new Senate language adds its wrinkles. This ruling is no longer a direct ban, but it shows that the infrastructure funds of the wide range of bold to adhere to the familiar preventive materials for 10 years. Unlike the Parliament’s version, the Senate version will also cover the laws of the criminal jurisdiction.
AI’s endowment supporters argue that it will not apply to the largest possible number of laws as critics claim, but the public attorney for public citizens in the field of accountability says, “Any great technical lawyer deserves their salt will make the argument that applies to, and that this is the way that was intended to write.”
Khanna says that some of his colleagues may not fully realize the base of the base. “I don’t think they thought about the extent of the peak endowment and the extent of obstructing the ability to protect consumers and children, against automation,” he says. In the days that passed through the house, Even MP Margore Taylor Green (R-GAA strong Trump ally said that she would have voted against OBB if I realized that Amnesty International’s endowment was included in the huge package of the text.
SB 1047 in California is the adhesive child of what players in the industry calls excessive enthusiasm. The draft law, which intended to put safety handrails on large artificial intelligence models, was. Revoked by the Democratic Ruler Gavin News After an intense pressure campaign by Openai and others. Companies like Openai, who once called the CEO of SAM Altman to organize the industry, It has recently focused When clearing the rules they say can prevent them from competing with China in the artificial intelligence race.
“What you really do with this endowment is the creation of the wild West.”
Khanna admits that there are “some very bad state regulations” and make sure that the United States remains before China in the artificial intelligence race should be a priority. He says: “But the approach to this must be abandoned by good federal regulations,” he says. With the frequency and inability to predict the innovation of artificial intelligence, Branch says, “The maintenance of states from trying to protect their citizens” without being able to expect future damage, “It is just reckless.” And if there is no legislation in the state guaranteed for a decade, as Khanna says, Congress does not face little pressure to pass its own laws. “What you really do with this endowment is the creation of the wild West,” he says.
Before the issuance of the trade text in the Senate, dozens of Khanna colleagues in California Democrats in the House of Representatives, led by Representative Doris Matsoy (D-CA,, A message signed For the leaders of the Senate who urge them to remove the rule of artificial intelligence – saying, “Americans are exposed to an increased list of damage as artificial intelligence techniques are adopted through sectors of health care to education, housing and transportation.” They warn that the comprehensive definition of Amnesty International “can be said that it covers any computer processing.”
More than 250 legislators in the state represent each state as well Urge Congress to drop the rule. “With the development of artificial intelligence technology at a rapid pace, government governments and local governments are more intelligent in their response than Congress and federal agencies.” “The legislation that cuts this democratic dialogue at the state level would freeze political innovation in developing best practices for artificial intelligence at a time when experience is vital.”
Khanna warns that the boat loss on the artificial intelligence list can have higher stakes than other Internet policies such as pure neutrality. “It will not only affect the Internet structure,” he says. “This will affect people’s functions. This will affect the role that algorithms can play in social media. This will affect every part of our lives, and it will allow a few people [who] Control of artificial intelligence for profit, without accountability for the public good, for the American public. “
