A battle over religion and schools in Oklahoma could decide the future of the First Amendment
At the heart of the issue of the religious school and others like The first amendment to the constitution – Two rulings on freedom of religion that are tension with each other. They are the institution’s item, which prevents the government from supporting a debt over another person or creating its own church, and the condition of free exercise, which says that everyone has the right to express their religious beliefs.
Generations of children were taught at school about how Thomas Jefferson said in 1802 Messages There is a “wall of separation between the church and the state.” In the past, the Supreme Court explained that the feelings were widely, and government officials, including public schools, followed him. Any procedures that can be explained as a sign that the debt approved by religion was largely outside the border.
Now, the issue of the religious school from Oklahoma can have a long time for the first amendment throughout the United States
Waltz and others like him are believed that the Supreme Court has made a mistake in the past. They point out that the first amendment itself does not say anything about the “separation wall” and focus more on their rights under the condition of free exercise.
As for the Supreme Court, it now has a majority of the province 6-3 preferred to force religious rights and in a series of recent decisions that strengthened the condition of free exercise, and sometimes at the expense of the foundation clause.
But even in the deep red Oklahoma, as President Donald Trump won every boycott in the elections last year, not every person boarding hope in promoting the institution’s item.
It is worth noting that the state prosecutor Jenner Dromond, a Republican colleague, strongly opposes the religious school plan, to the extent that he presented his legal challenge against it, which led to the participation of the Supreme Court.
He said in an interview: “We deserve intellectual honesty in this issue. It is related to religious indoctrination,” he said in an interview.
Dramund agreed that attempts to allow prayer in schools could be the next on the agenda if the Supreme Court supports the school’s proposal.
“The Supreme Court can decide how much you want to go,” said Dramund.
Walters, a Previous high school teacher, He strongly supports the Charter School Plan, which would turn the taxpayers of taxpayers directly into an entity controlled by the Catholic Church.
However, as the Bible distribution plan appears, he does not want to stop there.
He told NBC News that he also believes that the Supreme Court teacher 1962 Angel against Vitaly Judgment that the prayers banned in public schools must be transferred. The court detained in a New York case that reading an unfinished prayer in the classroom, in which students were not required to participate in the foundation clause.
The referee is a milestone that it is characterized by the semesters of the advanced government in high schools, which Walters made itself, and for the Federal Judicial Authority Educational materials.
“I think they were wrong to do so. Individuals have the right to express their religious beliefs. This does not stop in the school building,” Wallets said of the decision.
“A moment aha”
The Covid-19, who forced schools all over the country to transfer highways online, was the emergence of the plan to start a Catholic virtual rented school, according to Michael Scabirland, a former professor of law and is now an oaklauma-City diocese consultant.
There are already Catholic schools of bricks and mortar shells in Oklahoma, but they are in urban areas in what is a large rural country.
Skabaranda said in an interview with the Catholic shrine born in Oklahoma.
At that point, the Oklahoma School Council has already been established at the state level already and agreed to both non -religious personal schools. The church saw an opportunity to establish a virtual school and find a way to finance it.
It was clear that he would lead to a legal challenge, but in consultation with Nicole Garnett, a professor at the Faculty of Law at Notre Dame, who was with other conservatives they had. He has long argued For the benefit of religious rented schools, the diocese believed that it deserves a shot.
