A Trick of the Mind by Daniel Yon review – explaining psychology’s most important theory | Science and nature books
R.It is the perception that you feel very negative. We open our eyes and light floods; The world is only there, waiting for his vision. But in reality there is an active element that we do not notice. Our brains are always “fill” our cognitive experience, which complements the information received with current knowledge. For example, each of us has a spot in the back of our eye where there are no light receptors. We do not see the resulting hole in our vision because our brains ignore it. The phenomenon that we call “vision” is the result of a model that has been constantly updated in your mind, and is partially consisting of sensory information received, but partially from the foregoing forecasts. This is what is meant by a non -intuitive slogan for contemporary cognitive sciences: “Perception is the hallucinations subject to censorship.”
A century ago, a person who has a psychology has turned into Freud’s work for a comprehensive vision of how the mind works. To the extent that there is a psychological theory even remotely today, it is the hypothesis of “predictive treatment”. The brain is a prediction machine and our cognitive experiences consist of our previous experiences as well as new data. Daniel Yun is a hoax of the mind is just the most recent of these ideas, but it provides excellent evidence, as a scientist working on the front edge of this field and as a great clarity writer. Your mind suggests a “binding world of the skull”, suggests, constitutes hypotheses around the world and collect data to test it.
Wonderful research that is often reviewed here needs an audience that goes beyond dusty scientific journals. In 2017, the YALE Laboratory has recruited and mocked the sound and people with psychosis to participate in an experiment along with the non -auditory controls. Participants were trained in the experience of hearing hallucinations when they saw a simple visual pattern (which is very easy for psychologists). The team was able to demonstrate that the vocal contestants in their sample depend heavily on a more unanimous previous experience. In other words, we can all cultivate the ability to evoke the imaginary voice based on our expectations, but some people already have this tendency, and it can have a significant impact on their lives.
To clarify how expectations leak into a visual experience, Helen Uolol Scott, a physician at Yoon, managed to address people’s categories of the clarity of the moving images they saw. The main details are that when the participants were driven Expected Less clear in their perception, and this is exactly what they have informed. But the image clarity on the screen was not really poorer.
Sometimes, Yun’s book does not go deep. In Olawole Scott experiences, for example, Yon believes that the visual experience of the participants is the same one that has become less clear, or just their rulings on experience? Is there a meaningful difference? It also avoids engaging with some restrictions imposed on the predictive treatment approach, including how to calculate abstract thought. The challenges facing the hypothesis are interesting, and help to shed light on its details. In an advanced discussion in theory, this looks like censorship.
One of the most enjoyable things that popular science can do to surprise us at a new angle on how the world works. Yun’s book often does this because it extracts the effects of the predictive brain. We contemplated unreliable (“We see ourselves dim, through a cloud of noise”); The border between belief and awareness is mysterious what appears (“your mind begins to realize what it expects”); Conspiracy theories may be the result of adapting to the mind more open to unusual interpretations during periods of greater uncertainty. This is a complex field in psychology, with a large number of new works all the time. Folding it in such a vibrant reading is an impressive achievement.
