For nearly one month in Donald Trump, the courts, Congress, and the American people face the abolition of our democracy. Each of them will have to decide to either impose the constitution or submit, as Germany has done to the dictatorship. The president faced many court rulings that question whether his actions and policies are consistent with the United States’ constitution that he swore to defend and support them. The question now is, will it be wise and begin to follow the orders of the court, or will Congress work, or does the American people be closed?
One of the court ruled that he challenged the 14 constitutionY The amendment that defines citizenship and two other trials-so far-has been frozen to his authorized spending in Congress, and his attempt to calm Article 1, the strength of the portfolio, and the rights of Congress. Here we see in the continuous parallel with the way Hitler chose to rule, and it is parallel that must inevitably lead to nullifying that we learn whether America Trump is going on the path of continuous democracy or the hellish method of Germany in Hitler.
Two months after Hitler became a consultant in 1933, he, like Trump, today ignored his country’s constitution. In March 1933, with the National Socialism Party, he was shy of the majority in the Reichstag, Hitler sought and obtained the majority vote in the two -thirds of the room that passed what we know as the empowerment law. This law stripped the members of the authority in the authority granted to them by voters. The Empowerment Law allowed Hitler to overcome the laws approved by the legislative body; I allowed him to put the laws himself; She allowed him to ignore the constitution. She allowed him to ban and imprison his political opponents. Hitler made a dictator Germany. All this was done with a suitable procedure and apparently the veil of the best intention. Hitler unilaterally did not announce a dictator. Instead, he and the Nazi party said that all they want is to restore Germany’s lost position and the welfare of its people. National Socialists clearly wanted to make Germany a great again.
At that time, the empowerment law was known as “an act to remove the distress of the people and the sheikhs.” The distress of the Reich arose in Germany’s surrender in the First World War and the harsh conditions for the Treaty of Versailles. The talent impression of the treaty of Germany’s economy led to excessive inflation and enormous unemployment. The German currency has almost valuable. The employment, which stands at about 20 million in 1929, decreased to 11.5 million by the time when Reichstag voted to support the law. This was, of course, the distress of the people who were allegedly aimed at mitigating.
Donald Trump promised to make America a great again and retract the massacre that was claimed by the Biden administration. This, of course, is his right – if Congress is in line with his desires. Trump has repeatedly promised the campaign to advance in depth to what he sees in worrying spending, politicization of justice, and civil service biases. He also promised to rid the country of illegal immigrants and retreat from consuming citizenship. However, a large part of its economic agenda and the withdrawal of his nationality in the field of newborns are not rights under the field of the American President. In fact, when it comes to sexual rights and spending decisions, the constitution is clear. Like Hitler, Trump appears to indicate that he does not care terrifyly to obey the restrictions imposed by the constitution and the Congress on him. Like Hitler, he appears to be committed to disinfecting anyone who opposes him and making law himself. Here where the lessons of the enabling law become decisive.
While Hitler sought to obtain a legislative permission for his dictatorial rule, until now Trump has not been. Whether that or not, the American people and Congress will face difficult and essential options. Donald Trump, perhaps truly, believes that Congress has authorized huge quantities of waste spending. He claims that these expenses impose a huge burden on the American people, which creates patriotic distress. However, as the courts were held now, it is better at best that the president can retract the credits approved by Congress, which violates the authority granted to Congress under the constitution. Hitler followed the German constitutional procedure to eliminate the Reichstag salad. Does Trump try to do the same? Will Congress be in line with it?
The Council and the Senate may be forced, both of which have a small majority, to face the option that the Reichstag faced in March 1933., Like 14Y The language of amendment to the citizenship, then President Trump will have to make a very important decision. Is the law preferring to its own desires, or is he ready to put his own preferences before the Supreme Court ruling against his efforts to eliminate the nationality of birth or his efforts to grant himself the legislature and credits as Hitler did through the empowerment law?
If the law follows, as its right indicates and caution, democracy survives. If, instead, the Supreme Court ignores, the matter is up to the Republican members of the Congress to determine whether they are in their jobs to fulfill their office or that they are just a salary while the president raped his job and, as happened to the Regesag in 1933, returns them to any opinion on how to control Their voters. If Trump chooses to ignore the court rulings, Congress must remove Donald Trump from his post or hide behind the pretending that their actions only aim to remove the distress of the people and the regime. The hideous results for choosing the rhuchj are very clear. They could have chosen otherwise. Hitler needed to support the divided Catholic Center party and bought it with side functions. Trump is a deals maker and this is definitely a policy as usual. But such side tools stop being normal when they lead to the approval of the legislative branch to become the decoration, as did Reichstag.
The established democracies-for example, recently, the Republic of Korea-have been pressuring to retreat from democracy. Democracy is equivalent to ordinary people much better than any other form of government that if Trump is not wise, he must expect Congress to be removed or by mass protest, and may extend to the closure of the economy.
Nothing more than a winner, we must expect to be subject to the courts, Congress, and if necessary, people. Then democracy is preserved. If he does not, we must expect to lose his office, strength, dignity and legacy. If we reach the moment of an American empowerment, the Republicans in Congress must be expected to set democracy and the right -wing of the constitution before any side deal the moment it benefits politically while destroying the United States and their political future in this process.
Read more
On this topic
