On Thursday, the United States Court of Appeal banned the minimum court to put the California governor Gavin New No. Return to the control of the National Guard forces that the president Donald Trump Posted in Los Angeles. The Court of Appeal ruled that Trump could control the guards, while legal procedures continue to play.
Newsweek He arrived at the White House to comment via email Thursday evening.
Context
Fif up a lawsuit against newsom and California Trump after the guards posted to Los Angeles as part of an attempt to take demonstrations against migration and customs (Ice), Which was raided earlier this month, several Los Angeles neighborhoods, as the population of migrants and intensive industries increased.
The raids sparked widespread protests in Los Angeles, and the demonstrators called for ice to leave the city. The protests were largely peaceful, although some were transferred to violence, as people throw water bottles, cement, Molotov cocktails and other things in law enforcement officials.
Soon after the start of the protests, Trump released about 4000 soldiers to the National Guard and 700 of the actual naval infantry in the region, which led to an immediate reaction from Newsom, the mayor of Los Angeles Karen Bass Democratic legislators throughout the country.
Trump, for his part, compared the demonstrators repeatedly with the demonstrators and claimed that Los Angeles was “would burn” if he had not interfered.
Mark Chevilbin/a
What do you know
A committee of three judges in the American Court of Appeal for the Ninth Chamber ruled that Trump “is likely to act within his authority” when he wrote the National Guard in California to suppress the demonstrations.
The committee consists of two appointed Trump and one of the judges is appointed by the president at the time Joe Biden.
On Thursday, the decision was canceled that the American boycott judge, Charles Brayer, who issued a temporary temporary order earlier this month and who re -controlled the National Guard to newsom after prosecuting the ruler.
“The defendants are temporarily composed of the deployment of members of the National Guard in California, Los Angeles.” “The defendants are directed to re -control the National Guard in California to the Governor Newsom.”
The Court of Appeal said in its 38 -page ruling on Thursday: “Granting appropriate respect for the president’s design, we conclude that it is likely to act within his authority in the National Guard Guard.”
The opinion was not signed and issued on behalf of the entire committee.
What people say
Trump wrote about the social truth last week: “I have a campaign, and I got a historical mandate, the largest group deportation program in American history. The poll shows overwhelming public support to remove illegal, and that is exactly what we will do. As a great leader, anyone will defend or defend any customer. You must find you either self -deportation using the CBP Home or ICE application and remove you.
Newsom wrote at x Thursday evening: “This emphasis is that the Trump administration does not target the recklessness of immigrants who are not documented without any laughing inaccurate criminal records. It is completely separate from their own policies and the continuous military raid in Los Angeles, and the economy that stops working. It is the backbone of our economy.”
What happens after that
Breyer is scheduled to hear more arguments in the case in San Francisco on Friday, and after that he will decide whether to issue a preliminary order that would restrict Trump’s authority over nearly 4000 soldiers from the National Guard and 700 of the active naval infantry who are currently deployed on La
The federal judge will also affect California’s request to ban federal forces from the accompanying ice agents in their enforcement.
Update 6/19/25, 11:52 PM ET: This story was updated with additional information and context.
