As Club World Cup begins, MLS player bonus dispute remains as protests, allegations of retaliation cause chaos
The MLS and MLS association remains at odds because it relates to the player’s bonuses regarding the club’s World Cup, Hours before playing inter miami playing ahly In the opening match of the newly expanded competition on Saturday.
The source of the conflict is a section in the current mass negotiation agreementAllowing players only to collect 50 % of the prize money from the external championships and the picks that contain their profits at one million dollars. The new FIFA competition, which has been expanded from eight teams to 32, comes with a prize bowl of a total of one billion dollars, and has raised questions about any part of these profits that will go to the players themselves, especially in MLS. The league includes three teams participating in the competition – Inter Miyami, Seattle Sounders and LAFC – although the league and the association of players are unlikely to reach an agreement before the match started at the Hard Rock Stadium at Miami Gardens for the opening match.
At this stage, both sides agreed to adjust the section in the current CBA of the club’s World Cup, although they are still far from the issue. North American teams are guaranteed only $ 9.55 million to participate, which means that MLS players will be already in their profits before kicking the ball. If the MLS team wins all their team matches and continues to win the entire competition, they will answer more than $ 127 million.
CBS SPORTS has learned that each side shares only one proposal, both of them at the end of last week, although they are completely different-the MLS proposal is that the players will get 20 % of the performance related profits in addition to guaranteeing a million dollars, while the players ’association has reached 40 %. In the scenario in which a team will be perfect to the final, the difference between the profits will be divided by players 24,525,000 dollars under MLS proposal and $ 50,870,000 at the players ’association stadium.
“We are still sitting in what is a very disappointing place next to our side,” Bob Woz, CEO of the players Association, told CBS SPORTS.
Limited contact from the beginning
Both sides had understood that the CBA awards department could become a problem for the club’s World Cup, as it is discussed informally in the months before the tournament. When he announced FIFA Prize bowl mechanics of $ 1 billion In late March, though, the MLS Association and the Players Association were waiting for the other side to officially start the talks.
“The MLS had no commitment within CBA to make any changes,” Todd Durbin, CEO of MLS for the player and relationship strategy, argued in an interview with CBS SPORTS.
By this point, The league has already made some adjustments to the salaries for the club’s World Cup The participating teams will receive another $ 750,000 of allocation funds and another $ 1.25 million that must be paid over two years. According to a source, all three teams have reached 750,000 dollars, according to a source, although this did not address the issue of big profits that players can earn in the tournament this summer.
Fawz said that the players ’Association tried to involve MLS from the private sector in the months that followed FIFA, profit specifications, similar to the way the league reached Al -Ittihad to make adjustments to CBA in the past about existing rules. He said that the players’ association “had no luck in making them participate”, so they sent an official message to the Commissioner without Garper in the previous weeks. World Cup match at LAFC World Cup against Mexico America On May 31, “requesting to be involved and made them actually submitting a proposal.”
Since the message came before LAFC reserved its place in the competition, each player from both Sounders and MIAMI – including stars such as Lionel Messenger and Luis Suarez – have signed that message, for all FOSE. He said that all LAFC players later became the signature of that message.
The effect of Soundarrs protest
Things took a turn on June 1, when Sounders players wore the shirts that read “Club World Ca $ H Grab” about a picture of Mr. Monopoly Before the MLS match against Vancouver Whitecaps. Of course, the protest drew more attention to the complaints of MLS players while raising the temperature around the problem internally.
Durbin said that MLS informed the players’ Association on May 31 that the proposal was coming, but “this proposal has not changed at any time or back” due to the protest of Sounders.
Nevertheless, the Players Association claims that MLS owners spent the days that followed Sounderrs’s protest against “providing threats and revenge against MLSPA and players.” Jeffimsport mentioned This is the owner of Soundarrs Adrian Hanour, “he addressed anger” the team in the treasury room after their match on June 1, and he won himself that he had received one of these.
“There is no doubt that revenge had been in front of them since that protest,” he claimed. “My conversation with Don Garber shortly, I am expressly informed that their proposal would be less due to the protest, which is a large definition of revenge.”
The MLS proposal was finally 20 % on June 6, on Friday afternoon “when the players have already turned into a type of game mode,” as Foose described it. The Players Association sent the first proposal – until Saturday morning – by 40 % the next day.
One of the things that has not been an advantage of the week since the proposed sides were exchanged is a frequent communication line, which leads to a lot of uncertainty about when this problem will be solved. It is increasingly unlikely that things will reach a conclusion before the opening match of the World Cup on Saturday.
“On this topic, there was not much dialogue,” he said. “There was a call [Wednesday]But no, there was not much after that … I do not expect to be settled, no, but it might be so. “
