The “money for Texas” amendment: GOP budget could reward Greg Abbott for MAGA border stunts

Republicans in Congress slipped with an advantage in their budget that was approved on Thursday that would distribute billions of dollars to pay things like the Migrate Bus Initiative in Texas, funded and funded by the state Border wall.

and amendment To the budget of the House of Representatives, it was passed on Wednesday night, putting a 12 billion dollar aspect of the Minister of Internal Security Christie Nayyim To allocate countries, specifically to pay the price of programs that the Trump administration is supportive of the border security mission. This ruling provides the available funds to pay the states from any costs related to the help of the effort “to impose immigration laws, including through detention and removal, and to combat the illegal entry of people and smugglers.”

Under the ruling, the countries will be able to obtain compensation for activities related to immigration dating back to January 2021, when former President Joe Biden was opened.

But there is hunting: The amendment of the draft law also says that the Minister of Internal Security cannot grant money to any state that has received a payment under any other grant program managed by the administration.

Practically, this ban Goals The shelter and services program in FEMA, a program created to help government and local governments as well as humanitarian groups pay the price Associated costs With the receipt of immigrants while they are waiting for the results of the court’s procedures. These costs can include anything of food, shelter, transportation, medical care, or personal hygiene supply.

In fact, this language in the draft law means that states such as Texas, Florida and South Dakota can submit a request to receive funding for the encouraged actions as exciting political actions, such as a Abbot bus to migrants to cities like New York, Special decision To send the National Guard forces to the southern border as governor in the southern Dakota.

“Greg Abbott was asking Congress to do so, and we saw many members of the Republican Party in Congress this funding. So this, to a large extent, money for Texas,” said Aaron Reichlin-Maelanik, an older colleague in the American Immigration Council.

Adam Isaxon, Director of Defense Supervision at the Washington Office in Latin America, as noted in analysis Among the bill, which seems to be the $ 12 billion ruling, aims to a large extent to compensate Texas for the migrant bus program, which cost the state about 1900 dollars per seat, as well as other border initiatives of the state, which included Pushed Immigrants return across the border and installation Razor In Rio Grande.

Wola is close to the financing is similar to the Head Start Preschool program for low -income families or 22 times the company’s budget for public broadcasting, which is funded by NPR and PBS.

Republicans also installed their budget bill with huge financing of ice, which is enough to make it the best federal law enforcement agency ever, as well as many provisions that aim to make the immigration process more expensive and more difficult for migrants. In terms of higher numbers, Republicans allocated $ 15 billion to the ice for deportation, 16.2 billion dollars to employ new ice agents, $ 46.5 billion to build border barriers and $ 45 billion to detention for adults and family.

For example, the budget will require migrants to pay the minimum order fees worth $ 1,000 to apply for asylum and $ 500 fees to apply for special immigrant events, which are currently free requests. For immigrants with ICE detention, who earn about one dollar per day, this means that it will take nearly three years to earn enough money to apply for asylum.

The bill also includes a ruling that imposes a $ 100 fee for immigrants who request additional time to immigration procedures to obtain a lawyer, which focuses only on the difficulties standing on the way of migrants in terms of finding a legal advisor for their immigration procedures.

“This puts a critical price for defending yourself in court and seeking humanitarian protection,” said Reichlin-Melnik to the salon. “It excessively people for the right to defend themselves in court.”