Ban on Palestine Action as ‘terrorists’ is shameful | Protest

I am a former president, and I tried to become a police commissioner and the crime of the Labor Party. So I am not easily classified as a supporter of terrorism or criminal activity. The decision to ban action Palestine as a terrorist group exceeds the satire (Report, June 20). I think that embarrassment from the fun security failures at the British Royal Air Force base may be the ruling and a good meaning.

The prohibition of a group for peaceful protest – albeit illegal – is a stigma. It is almost disgraceful like the continuous support in the United Kingdom of the Israeli state in the apartheid. If the Minister of Interior is very keen on an organized ban, then why not prohibit the terrorist group known as the name Israel Defense Forces? They kill innocents daily, yet the government that has been voted on has nothing at all.

Words mean nothing. The leadership of Israel ignores them, but our government still exists in arming it. The proposal to prohibit work is not democratic, and frankly shameful. It is a misuse of an important law – it is used here to suppress support for the Palestinians. The Minister of the Interior seems to have left a reason behind him.
MEREDYDD Hughes
Bradwell, Derbeshire

The plan to prohibit Palestinian action is a failure in this government to engage in a meaningful discussion with all those who denounce Israeli measures in Gaza and the West Bank, and to support our government of these measures. The protest group has made clear that the reason for using the spraying paint on two planes was to draw the attention of the public to support for the presence of the British Royal Air Force of Israeli actions.

This logistical support has taken multiple forms, and the public only realizes some. At the same time, the government often condemned the genocide policies of Israel. It should not be surprised when its support for Israel leads to disturbing reactions. I recently joined a great, friendly and peaceful march in London to support the Palestinian cause. I strongly hope that the Minister of Interior in British history of tolerance will look at protest in its future policies.
Simon Barber
Autoxter, Stavedshire

The government responds to a few people who sprinkle the paint and break the windows by declaring “terrorists”. If this is terrorism, then the word loses all meaning. Their ban can be justified – and their supporters – if they carry out or invite a campaign to kill and/or physical harm. But unless the government was able to provide evidence of the latter, the ban on a war against war is ridiculous, and puts a very dangerous precedent.

Are the anti -Establish terrorists? Vassincts hunt? Even rioters last year were not called terrorists, but they caused chaos in many cities and cities. No one is safe if the helm is the base.
Peter Lucci
Chaderton, Greater Manchester

So you are now a terrorist if you need the government that supports genocide for innocent people? The action of the small sabotage hardly people blows, but this government supports the deadly behavior in Gaza in all our names, regardless of the number of times we go to the streets or write to our deputies. The rights of polling would have been from terrorists if we used this standard. I am not a member of Palestine, but they look just like people.
Mary Gildia
Charlton, London