Entertainment

Blake Lively’s Lawyers Fight Against Taylor Swift Blackmail Claims

Lawyer L. Blake Blake He fights against a claim from Justin BalouniLawyer, Brian Friedman, who tried to a member of the Levli Legal Team to blackmail Taylor Swift In the release of a support statement for the star “A Simple Favor”.

according to Friedman’s messageHe was submitted to the court and Judge Louis J. Lehman on Wednesday, “Michael Gottlieb called Wilki Var, the lawyer for the vital defendant, with a virus lawyer representing Mrs. Swift and called for Mrs. Swift, who will be called a personal statement in MS.

It is impossible to verify Friedman’s accusation independently because he depends only on information from “an unveiled source who is likely to have reliable information.” No other sources have been submitted to support the claim in Friedman’s file.

In a joint statement with diverseGottlieb criticized the accusation as “categorically false” and “the source of the coward is sources of unknown sources, and it was not fully linked to reality.

“This is what we expected from Wayfarer lawyers, who seem to be more than shooting first, without any evidence, and without care for people who are hurting in this process,” said Gottlieb. “We will submit requests with the court informally to hold these lawyers accountable for their misconduct here.”

Lively Camp continued to submit a file Heavy message On its own to Judge Lehman, demanding that Friedman accused of the record.

“On behalf of our customer, Blake Livly, we move with respect to hitting the message signed by Mr. Brian Friedman and presented earlier today,” Read a message from the lawyer Asra Hudson. “This message, which has not been provided with any support of any kind of any kind, is much lower than anything under the section, accuses Mrs. Livly and her lawyer, of engaging in” tampering with witnesses and evidence “based on an unknown unknown source.”

The message continued, “It should be necessary to respond to an unknown source, unfounded, reckless allegations without any supportive evidence. It is worth noting the record, however, each of the allegations in Friedman’s speech is inappropriately in it. The purpose.

This is back and forth stems from a movement By Swift’s Camp in Venable LLP to cancel a summons to produce documents, which were Serve On May 9. The summons was regarding Baldoni Displacement lawsuitWhich was presented in January. The lawsuit contained texts between Lively and Baldoni, which Lively seems to refer to Swift as “one of its teething”. After the news broke out about the summons, a representative of Swift denied any participation in Lively and Baldoni “that he ends with us”, from which the litigation stems between them.

The statement wrote, “Taylor Swift did not set foot on the collection of this film, she did not participate in any initial or creative decisions, and did not record the movie, and you have never seen editing or writing down any notes on the film, and she did not see” until she ended with us until weeks after its public release, and she was traveling all over the world during the year 2023 and 2024 went to the highest tour of history. “

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button