Trump’s ‘activist’ judges comments break with reality— and limits of the courts

president Donald Trump His allies have been inhabited against federal judges because of their prohibition of major executive orders during his second term, accusing the so -called “activist” judges in overcoming their authority and preventing him from fulfilling some of his higher political priorities.
Some Trump’s executive orders and the most severe executive procedures have been banned or suspended by federal courts to allow a full hearing on the foundations. But the system of checks and balances also means that these rulings can be reviewed – either by appealing to the Supreme Court or by Congress, which has the power to pass laws or expand some of the executive branches.
It is part of a frankly designed government system that provides every branch, including the presidency, and a lot of options for review.
Berriel Huil of Columbia County in Colombia County said in a referee earlier this year:
But this does not mean that Trump is without options. Here is how it can seek to decline against the wave of court actions.
President Donald Trump delivers a speech that determines his 100th day in Warren, Michigan, on April 29, 2025.
Set
Since he took office, Trump’s executive orders have been appealed by hundreds of lawsuits in the Federal Court, although all of them have not succeeded, and some remain in the early stages of the review.
Prosecutors have sought to prevent the dismantling of some federal agencies, the chairman and inspectors who opened fire by Trump, and restricted the arrival of the government efficiency agency in Elon Musk, among other things.
but Like groups that file lawsuits, The Trump administration also has the ability to appeal any minimal court decisions that are considered unfavorable or exceeding the federal court.
Meanwhile, you can seek a residence in emergency situations to restore the executive demand so that the issue can be heard in its advantages.
The Supreme Court agreed to do so on many major cases. He stood with Trump to remove two federal members of the Board of Directors who opened fire earlier this year, which was reflected in a minimum court.
Last week, the Supreme Court raised The minimum court order This stopped Trump’s ban on sexually transformed military personnel – allowing his request and policies related to moving forward, at least at the present time.

President Donald Trump speaks to the media after signing executive orders at the White House in the White House on April 23, 2025. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Work with Congress
The Trump administration can seek a permanent change by working with the Republican majority in the congressional councils to write the priorities of the largest policy, protected the level of review that was currently granted to the courts in the absence of any legislation.
According to Federal Regulations Blog The Federal Registry, or the CEO of the CEO, can be canceled or modified only by the president or through the legislative branch, if the president is behaving on the authority granted by Congress.
Prosecutors of the Federal Court claimed that Trump’s recent executive procedures exceed the scope of what Congress authorized – and in the absence of clearly written laws, Federal judges enjoy a broad power to explain the Acts of the Executive Authority’s actions.
Critics of the courts Congress To reduce this authority – either by stripping the financing of federal courts, isolating judges or eliminating judicial seats, among other things.
“When Federal judges take off their judicial parades and ascend to the political arena and throw political punching, they must expect strong political compensation from the Article Three project,” Mike Davis, founder and head of the Article Three Project, or A3P, told Fox News Digital in an interview.
“And when the federal judiciary loses its legitimacy, it loses everything,” said Davis.
But these steps are very controversial, and it is not clear whether they can get the widespread support required by both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Here is why dozens of lawsuits seek to cancel Trump’s early behavior as a failure head

President Donald Trump looks at the President of the Supreme Court John Roberts in the role of Melania Trump, Donald Trump Junior and Ivanka Trump after they swore during the opening ceremony in Rotonda in Capitol on January 20, 2025. (Chip Somodevilla/Pool via Reuters/File)
Other options
The options available for the White House are more limited by the constitution. The president can appoint federal judges, but he cannot shoot them. The executive authority is also responsible for enforcing the court’s rulings, and the president may excel or cancel his delivery.
Meanwhile, Trump’s allies also sought to retract the force of the courts in other non -traditional ways.
The First Legal American Foundation, a legal group supporting the garment founded by White House assistant Stephen Miller between the first and second periods of Trump, filed a lawsuit against supreme court Judges John Roberts, as the official head of the American Judicial Conference, and Robert J. Conrad, Director of the American Administrative Office, earlier this month.
The lawsuit accuses both parties of conducting some organizational actions that exceed the scope of the “basic functions” of the judiciary – which they argue with them must put them under the thumb of the executive branch.
Click here to get the Fox News app
“The American president is not king – not even one of them” elected ” – and his strength to remove federal officials and honest civil service staff like the plaintiff is not at all.”