Timid new online safety laws won’t prevent more tragedies like the death of my daughter Molly | Ian Russell

R.Omorrow should be a gathering moment Online safety law It comes into effect. Unfortunately, it seems as if we were going back. The Offcom organizer decided to spread shyness as the ambition is required. Instead of focusing on reducing harm and preventing tragedies, its approach appears to be aimed at reducing the economic costs of technology companies that caused the damage that caused it.

Instead of giving priority to the basic principles of the child’s safety, one of the minister indicated that the symbols that come into effect were consulted to make them “evidence of judicial review.” Legal caution exceeds the safety of children.

This is not what Parliament imagines when it passed the online safety law. Certainly not what the bereaved families have done for. New measures provide only quick protection from suicide content and self -control and explain how Offcom He failed to act quickly on advanced threats and online escalation facing young people.

Adolescents are no longer at risk only to think of suicide and self -harm content through aggressive algorithms, a preventive harm that costs my daughter Molly. Weak young people are now targeted by horrific online groups, forcing them to harm the self and even suicide. The FBI issued warnings about these groups and warned last week against a “severe increase” in its activity. European and Canadian law enforcement sparked a similar warning.

International law enforcement agencies are clear that some young people, who often struggle with their mental health, are prepared to commit violent acts against themselves and others on the video or live broadcast. These groups are driven by the same thing “Film ideologies“The violent motives that were transferred to the spotlight Axel Rodakobana And horrific events in Soutbort.

Despite the clear warnings about this increasing threat, Offcom has chosen to act. Technology companies will not face a single targeted procedure to treat suicide crimes and self -harm crimes in symbols that can be enforced from tomorrow. Because of the structural weaknesses in the law, Offcom will not be able to fix this error for another 18 months, even if you decide to act.

In the face of this failure to work, the government should intervene. This is the message that I delivered to the Prime Minister when we recently met. So far, this government has failed to understand the nettle. The Minister of Technology, Peter Kyle, issued mysterious and confusing promises to improve the legislation he described himself “Not satisfactory” and “unequal”. In the face of urgent harmful damage to the government hour, last week, a vision of “partial” improvements began.

I want to be clear that the failure of the Foreign Minister and Self -Palaces will cost more young people. His proposals is the adhesion policy that the Prime Minister truly said he refused. Broken parents now lose confidence in Kyle. We strongly believe that the audience is next to us – 85 % of parents want stronger laws. Parents want the government to act decisively alongside children and families.

The decision to reform and strengthen the online safety law is also logical. The economic modeling of the government shows that the strongest organization, which reduces exposure to online damage by 15 %. 4 billion pounds each year. Online safety is not only good for society; It is also good for growth.

Of course, there are those who refute this, and to put freedom of expression of platforms on reasonable and necessary measures to protect children from harm. Among them is the White House hawks, which issued an executive order that guides officials to “recommend the appropriate procedures to confront” online safety law.

I am increasingly concerned that the government can stop more vital online safety measures to satisfy the White House or Dodge Drifs or even chase a business. But parents in the United Kingdom are also watching. They do not want the safety of their children to danger through an exported agenda written by Tech Libertaris and JD Vance. They expect to hear by their government. The poll shows that Nine in 10 People support policies that give priority to children’s safety online, even if this means that technology companies are investing much less in the United Kingdom.

Parents will judge the Prime Minister by responding to the damage that can now occur on his watch. They will be harshly judged if this decisive test fails. But they will also stand by him and encourage him if he takes decisive action to ensure online safety for children.

• Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you want to provide a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered to be published in our Messages Please section Click here.