American officials are considering the effects of national security for the apparent artificial intelligence break (AI) by the Chinese company, Dibsic, according to the White House press secretary Caroline Levitte.
This announcement comes after the US Navy prevented its members from using Deepseek applications due to “potential security and moral fears.”
Meanwhile, the ChatGPT, Openai, promised to work closely with the United States government to prevent competitors from taking technology.
Earlier this week, the artificial intelligence model in the cheap Depsik caused a strong but strong decline in the shares of American technology companies, as investors asked about the billions of dollars they spend on the new infrastructure of artificial intelligence.
“I spoke with [the National Security Council] This morning, they are looking for what [the national security implications] Ms. Levitte, who also re -re -remarks US President Donald Trump, said a day before Dibsic should be an invitation to wake up to the American technology industry.
According to CNBC, the US Navy sent an e -mail to its employees warning them against using Deepseek due to “possible and moral security associated with the origin of the model and its use.”
The navy did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the BBC News.
Speaking to Fox News, “The White House AI and Crypto CZAR”, David Sachs suggested that Deepseek has used the models developed by the first Openai of the United States to improve.
This process – which involves one model of artificial intelligence from another – is called knowledge.
Mr. Sachs said: “There is fundamental evidence that what Dipsik did here is that they distorted the knowledge of Openai.” “I think one of the things that you will see in the next few months is the leading artificial intelligence companies that take steps to try to prevent distillation … This will definitely slow down some of these counterfeit models.”
Openai said this in a later statement saying that the Chinese and other companies “are constantly trying to distill the leadership of the American AI companies.”
As the leading construction of Amnesty International, we are involved in counter -measures to protect us [intellectual property]… and we believe as we move forward it is very important that we are working closely with the United States government to protect the most capable models. “
Meanwhile, Dibsic says it was the goal of electronic attacks. On Monday, she said it would be temporarily limited to records due to “large -scale harmful attacks” on her programs.
A banner currently appears on the company’s website says that registration may be busy as a result of attacks.
Yuyuan Tantian, a social media channel as part of the CCTV broadcaster in China, claims that the company has faced “several electronic attacks in recent weeks, which have increased in” distress “.
Dibsic launched fame last week as Ai Geeks praised the latest AI and people began to download Chatbot to application stores. Its rise caused a decrease in American technology shares, many of which have regained some land.
But the artificial intelligence industry in America was shaken by the apparent penetration, especially because of the prevailing opinion that the United States was ahead of the race. It is believed that a large group of commercial restrictions prohibiting China’s arrival in high -end chips has strengthened this.
Although China has strengthened the investment in advanced technology to diversify its economy, Deepseek is not one of the major Chinese companies that were developing artificial intelligence models to compete with the United States Chatgpt.
Experts say that the United States still has an advantage – it is home to some of the largest chip companies – and that it is not yet clear how deep is building its model and to what extent it can go.
When Deepseek shook the markets this week, President Trump described it as a “vigil” for the American technology industry, noting that it might eventually prove that it is a “positive” sign.
“If you can do it cheaper, if you can do this [for] less [and] Access to the same end result. “I think this is a good thing for us,” he told reporters on the first air force.
He also said that he was not worried about the achievement, adding that the United States would remain a dominant player in this field.
Additional reports from the fan Wang
