I was disappointed to see a speech promoting a false scientific margin (Cold fusion may be an alternative to applicable energy to rely on fossil fuels and messages, January 28). Many scientists have tried and they failed to reproduce Martin Flechman And Stanley Pons First Report on cold merger. After years of intense scrutiny, the dominant scientific community concluded with an overwhelming majority in the early 1990s that the cold fusion was not a reliable idea supported by experimental evidence – a conclusion that stands after three decades of research.
The authors of the letter note to the guardian that cold integration research is now suppressed from publishing. In fact, credible strict studies are still published in good reputable magazines (such as a 2019 study in nature), But none of them successfully noticed the success of the cold fusion. The letter claims that companies “managed to make these reactions work reliably”, but do not provide any evidence to support this.
The climate crisis requires an immediate procedure, but these measures must be based on strict and repetitive science. It would be great to live in a world where the cold fusion was a reality, but we cannot wave a magic stick and change the laws of nature.
Dr. Philip Thomas
Post -PhD research, department Physics Astronomy, University of Exter
