I doubt that the government understands what the disabled needs to work (Starmer cancels the Starmer Benefits “Worse all over the world” before deep discounts, March 10). I have a mental health condition, physical disabilities, and nerve nerves. To do a part -time work, I had to work for their own account, simply to work at the level of my skill and experience. It costs me approximately 1000 pounds per month in different ways to stay well enough to work constantly-all after the tax.
NHS only keeps me alive-it is not interested in improving my life, for example, by treating the hideous side effects of medicines-the tax system rejects the realization that anything is more than keeping it alive. and exhaustion The government believes that it can offer people in the work world without any resources to make them well enough to attend, day after day?
Until NHS can do a lot more than just keeping us alive, and the tax system realizes the extent that we cost the remaining gap between existence and wellness at work, it will have any severe consequences.
I cannot bear the idea of the work government that is repeated The tragic losses in life It was seen when the personal independence payment system was as well It was strongly presented By conservatives. I was widely satisfied with what the Labor Party did with less money in Kitty, but this is interesting.
Heather Bingham
Wortwell, Norfolk
Your article (March 12It mentions plans to reduce global credit for those who were judged in favor of work. If someone is really unable to work due to illness or disability, how can it be there any A justification to reduce their benefits? I would really like to understand the logic behind this. If someone falsely claims that he is unable to work, this should be taken through the evaluation process.
As someone who loved his work as a teacher until I was forced to stop working nine years as a result of a brain injury, I can assure the government that reducing my entitlement will not help my mind.
Caroline Soton
Glastonbury, Sumerrest
In the 1970s, when I worked as a professional psychiatrist (OP) of the Ministry of Labor at the time, there was a more humane and effective way to restore patients in the long term to work from current penalties and penalties. In industrial rehabilitation units who recover from injury or illness that spend several weeks in places similar to work that is evaluated by a team including OP, doctor, social worker, resettlement employee, before placing it in appropriate work or training. This has succeeded well, such as the appropriate prison rehabilitation scheme that reduces oud rates.
Enabling those deprived of helping themselves is more effective and cheaper in the long run, than the simple “punishment”.
Michael Miller
Sheffield
The Prime Minister is right to the broken benefits system in Britain, but if the country needs to restart the system, the government needs to respect the rights while it is done. Sufficient social security is not a political gift, it is a human right. People have the right to eat and live safely with their families and in societies, the United Kingdom has the right to commit. However, successive governments failed to respect and impose these rights.
Now, instead of using this moment to address the root causes of housing costs and essentials outside of control, and the reliance resulting from food and debt banks for many people, this government appears to play with the exhibition and sell its reformist accreditation data by assuming threats to reduce the “burden” on the community of people who suffer from disease or disruption. For many in the UK, poverty is a political choice imposed on them. The Prime Minister can choose to finish it.
Sasha Desmokh
CEO, Amnesty Organization
Care Starmer The enormous benefits bill cannot be reduced without addressing the crisis in primary care in England. Medical certificates are signed by GPS. To help someone return to work or advise them properly about his position requires time, perfectly, a face date for face. I have worked as a general nature of NHS for more than 20 years. Every day we had to give priority to seeing people who were fine for some of these other important needs. I, like many of my colleagues, prepared a medical certificate for a patient that I do not know without a phone call. We spend long hours support patients with the appeal process when they cut or stop their advantages. The demand for appointments will rise where the advantages and poverty strikes are cut.
Dr. Natalie Sims
London
