Wellness

Cutting Medicaid? – The New York Times

Republican leaders in Congress directed the committee that supervises Medicaid to reduce $ 880 billion from the following budget. They say that these cuts are not necessarily Aim In Medicaid, the insurance program for 72 million poor and handicapped. Discounts can come from medical care, for example. But Trump pledged not to touch this very common program. This amount cannot come from anywhere else.

The Republican process has just started, and we do not yet know how legislators will change the program. Most of Medicaid money goes to the states, so the best way to think about the proposal is to reduce state budgets. The legislators in the state can interact by dropping coverage, raising taxes, or lowering other parts of their budget. In the newsletter today, I will explain some possible scenarios.

Medicaid is designed to divide the patient’s medical bills: the federal government and the state, each of which pays a specific share. (The state’s contribution depends on its reality.)

The law is accurate about what medicaid – cancer and kidney transplants should be covered, for example, but not artificial legs – and Republicans cannot change this with a budget bill. Each state must cover some of the population, including poor children, pregnant women, persons with disabilities and patients in the care homes of the elderly who have run out of money.

Most states also choose to cover an optional collection that was added as part of Obamacare in 2014: anyone earns less than a specific income (about $ 21,000 for one person). Republicans want to impose a condition of work on this group for people who have not been given. This idea is popular with the public, but it will provide the federal government only about 100 billion dollars, and not sufficient to face the Republican party’s goal.

Anything more to lower the federal government share will put the burden on the states. And the legislators there can deal with the problem in their own ways. They can reduce an optional population like Obamacare. Twelve states have laws that will do so automatically if federal financing decreases. If they do not want to drop people, the states can drop optional benefits, such as covering prescribed medications.

After these cuts, countries face difficult options.

They can pay doctors and hospitals and the homes of the elderly less for care. But there is an end. If Mississippe suddenly starts paying $ 50 for echocardiography instead of about $ 160, cardiologists may stop seeing Medicaid patients. (Many medicaid patients are already struggling to find care because the program pays very little doctors.) The cuts like this can also put some homes of the elderly or rural hospitals.

However, countries will still need more money for medicaid, usually their second largest expenditures after education.

Where can they get it? They had to sacrifice other priorities. One option is to reduce education. Another is to raise taxes. None of these federal legislations will require; It is up to the states how they deal. This allows Republicans in Congress to say that they do not cut the benefits of medical or eligibility, even if this is the inevitable effect in most places.

Republicans indicate that the original agreement between Washington and the states has faded, and the federal reserve covers more than their share. This is correct. during Various accounting Tricks, countries have reduced Medicaid contributions and now paid about a third of the bill, on average. In addition, Washington assumed the full cost of OBAMACARE expansion 2014.

But this expansion made Medicaid popular. More than half of the Americans Say someone in his family used the program, and only 17 percent supported to reduce his budget. Local lawmakers may not also beat voters by cutting education or raising taxes to save Medicaid. For this reason the Democrats settled on Medicaid The highest point of discussion About the Republican Party’s budget plan.

Republicans tried to reduce Medicaid’s budget in 2017 as well. The popular opposition helped defeat the effort, as did the intense pressure by Republican rulers, who urged the members of the Senate not to leave them with a huge financial hole.

The lack of popularity of this bill – its failure – the Democrats helped restore the House of Representatives next year.

Related to: Medical aid, and the imposition of taxes on scholarships and killing gas plants: A guide to the list of republican wishes.

In India, youth lead A boom in festivals is large and small. These readers are increasingly consumes books in their original and English tongues. They learn in ways that the higher education system in India – with its focus on exams – does not encourage.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button