Current Affairs

Democrats call for Hegseth to resign as new details emerge on latest intelligence leak – live | Trump administration

Democrats call for Hegseth to resign as Republicans echo Trump’s support for secretary

Despite rumbles in the Pentagon over Pete Hegesth’s ability to do his job, Republican lawmakers have largely followed Donald Trump’s lead and backed the controversy-mired defense secretary while Democrats are calling for his resignation.

A post on Senate Republican’s X account today, blamed “disgruntled” former employees for the bad press: “Secretary Pete Hegseth is a veteran who is implementing President Trump’s America first agenda. Disgruntled former employees at the Pentagon are trying to undermine the agenda that Americans voted for.”

Yesterday senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee blamed the left: “Of course the left, libs, and leakers are angry with Pete Hegseth. He is a strong @SecDef who is shaking up the status quo at the Pentagon to fight back against America’s greatest threats. Our military and nation are stronger because of his courage to serve.”

Senate intelligence committee chair Tom Cotton claimed former Pentagon employees were “trying to undermine” both Hegseth and Trump’s agenda. And Cory Mills, a member of House armed services committee, said on X: “I fully stand with and support @SecDef.”

However, reacting to that NBC News report, Democratic representative Angie Craig said Hegseth should be fired for “gross negligence” which had put US service members at risk: “He never should’ve been hired in the first place, but his gross negligence in putting our service members at risk is more than enough to be fired for.”

And Debbie Wasserman Schulz also called for his resignation: “Pete Hegseth’s incompetence is a threat to our national security. He needs to resign immediately.”

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Pete Hegseth blames ousted officials for leaks in latest Signal chat scandal

Joseph Gedeon

Embattled US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has defended his most recent use of the encrypted messaging app Signal to discuss sensitive military operations, blaming fired Pentagon officials for orchestrating leaks against the Trump administration.

Pete Hegseth is facing calls to resign over his use of Signal to discuss sensitive military operations. Photograph: Alex Brandon/AP

In an interview with former colleagues at Fox News on Tuesday morning, Hegseth suggested the problems stem from former officials, appointed by this administration, for leaking information to damage him and Donald Trump, adding that there was an internal investigation and that evidence would eventually be handed to the justice department. He asked:

When you dismiss people who you believe are leaking classified information… why would it surprise anybody if those very same people keep leaking to the very same reporters whatever information they think they can have to try to sabotage the agenda of the president or the secretary.

In a statement posted on X over the weekend, the three dismissed top officials – Dan Caldwell, Colin Carroll and Darin Selnick – wrote that they were “incredibly disappointed” by the way they were removed, adding that “unnamed Pentagon officials have slandered our character with baseless attacks on our way out the door.”

Hegseth, in the interview, also confirmed the news that his chief of staff Joe Kasper will stay at the Pentagon, but it’s “going to be in a slightly different role”.

The controversy stems from recent reporting in the New York Times, after a second Signal chat was identified where he is again believed to have shared sensitive operational details about strikes against Houthis in Yemen – including launch times of fighter jets, bomb drop timings and missile launches – with a group of 13 people, including his wife, brother and personal lawyer, some of whom possessed no security clearance.

Hegseth dismissed those reports in the interview, characterizing criticism as politically motivated attacks. He told Fox and Friends:

No one’s texting war plans. What was shared over Signal then and now, however you characterize it, was informal, unclassified coordinations for media coordination among other things.

It has since emerged via NBC News that the sensitive information the defense secretary shared in that group chat came from a top general’s secure messages.

Share

Updated at 

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button