Benefits cuts now? What’s the point of a Labour MP who votes for something so cruel, tin-eared and short-sighted? | John McDonnell
EThe messages in deputies are flowing from disabled persons and care providers, who are really afraid of government resources suggestions and ministers’ speeches that the benefits they depend on must be cut.
The latest comments for a journalist from someone Described as a The internal government clearly shows what some ministers raises in this case. This person accused the representatives of the Labor Party who express their voters’ fears about the proposals to reduce the benefits of “Perle’s holding”.
It is clear that some politicians have not learned anything from A disaster for paying fuel in the winter It is still angrily raised on the threshold of the threshold with resisting the work. More importantly, it seems that they have not learned anything from the entry of the work capacity for the disabled, almost associated with 600 suicide death In England between 2010 and 2013.
As many said, the bars of the treatment of the disabled and the sick are not exhaustion road. He calls the question: Why do you become a deputy employment if you want to vote for a policy that fly in the face of all this work at all?
We have heard that there is an ethical argument to justify government plans. There is definitely a strong moral argument to provide professional support and sympathy to help people enter work if they are able to do so. There is no moral condition to push more people to poverty by reducing benefits levels, or denying access to financial support for those who have no alternative.
The lack of understanding, sympathy for policy planning and the expression of the government was a shock. A report was published after the report by Thinktanks and specialized charities, including the Institute of Employment Studies, Decision Corporation and Joseph RunterTo explain the ordeal of patients and disabled; How the numbers and the best ways to address this issue rose?
Although people live longer, they do not necessarily live a longer healthy life. The increase in retirement age means that many simply cannot be able to work physically until the retirement age. the The rise in young people who claim benefits For illness and disability, especially with regard to mental health conditions, they must be understood in the context of the austerity generation that comes to books.
Throughout my presence as Shadow, I highlighted, along with many charities and professional bodies, the impact of the huge discounts on social welfare. They prevented those early interventions to support families and youth by social workers and expert specialists who can identify and address emerging problems before exacerbation.
We are now reaping the cumulative influence of austerity measures cultivated by the Conservative Party advisers. Liz Kendall, Minister of Labor and Pensions, gets all this and it seems that he is working on designing a system whose primary principle supports sick and handicapped persons, not to punish them. I realized that this needs to invest in the short term to collect professional resources together, but it will bring its fruits in the long run.
It is clear that the Minister of Health, and he is weaving, gets it because he was putting in an additional place 8500 mental health workers To face the challenges of our mental illness within our society.
It seems that all this calm and positive political preparation runs on the coarse cabinet, which seems to be the request for discounts has risen from 3 billion pounds, planned by the conservatives to 6 billion pounds now. Obsessive commitment and bad judgment by the extreme financial rules by the treasury knocks on this government outside the path.
Excluding the increasing taxes on the wealthy when groups like national millionaires also call them, also seems to be ideological and foolish. With this overwhelming majority of the House of Commons, Kiir Starmer and Rashil Reeves are not afraid of losing any votes in Parliament.
However, many work representatives wake up to the fact that movements such as lowering fuel payment in the winter, and now disability benefits, can easily lose their seats. Reform in the UK can take advantage of the infection of these policies and build a base in its electoral districts to publish it in the upcoming elections.
There are only a few days before the publication of the green paper on the advantages of social welfare and slightly more than a week before the spring statement.
There is still time for the behavior of the workers’ cabinet like the cabinet, and for its members to stand in front of the treasury to stop the discounts in the benefits of patients and disabled people, and to insist on a more flexible interpretation of financial rules and a limited set of tax measures. This would follow the guideline principle that the widest shoulders should bear the heaviest burden.
