With Donald Trump’s return to the White House, conservative grudges have long been transformed against positive action and programs designed to raise the effects of racial discrimination to a charming chase. In the past decade, the Conservatives made the attack on SorrowPositive action, critical race theory, and well -known diversity and fairness initiatives, and now, as DEI moves the target, but the message is the same: fighting racism is exciting and discriminatory and must end at any cost.
Today, Dai is at the intersection. Its flexibility has made widespread blame for the game. DEI can be many things, from the efforts made to increase the diversity of the workplace through employment initiatives to create convergence groups that bring together workers an active representative. It may also include training in workplace on topics such as racism, gender discrimination and sexual harassment. Undoubtedly, there was a DEI programming introduction from pork that intervened or even alienated, which causes workers to feel that they are told what they thought about or how they feel. However, for the largest part, it is a relatively benign practice aimed at increasing diversity, while sending a message that the workplace should be fair and open to all.
However, at the right of the oath, Dei was distributed to something evil, and it becomes the discrimination that it seeks to get rid of. “I think there is a specific feeling to combat eggs in this country. I don’t think it will be very difficult to address it frankly. But I think the laws are very unfair now.” Reverse the comment is the clear mood of the six. Fifty percent of Republicans who said, in an opinion poll, they believe that white people are exposed to discrimination based on their skin color. (Several studies have shown that most Dei benefits have accumulated for white women. Find “White women achieved the largest percentage in the seats of the Board of Directors acquired in both Fortune 100 and Fortune 500.” According to the recent data conducted by the ZIPIA job search site, more than seventy -five percent of the “diversity officers” of eggs, and more than half of them are white women.)
What Dei’s criticism tends to indicate this, but not completely publicly, is that specialized white people are replaced by incompetent people. Just as the universities were blamed for the displacement of qualified and eligible American students who are eligible for black students who are not eligible Supreme Court dismissed for positive proceduresThe liberals are now accused of settling the health and safety of the public to satisfy the demographic interests of black workers that are not competent and unqualified. The DEI was blamed for the collapse of the Baltimore Bridge Francis Scott Ki, forest fires in Los Angeles, and the air collision in a helicopter and a plane that killed sixty -seven people in Washington, DC, Trump uses Di To move through the black and female workforce in an inconsistent manner and to provide the programs that he and his advisor Elon Musk Announcement to be shaky and unnecessary. Among federal health workers, their black employees According to what was reported, the focus was From the right “Dei Monitoring list”, whose names and salaries were published alongside the alleged Dei crimes.
The validity of the claims should be considered in the light of those who make them. Trump and musk are suddenly the voice of anti -discrimination efforts mocking this idea. Throughout Trump’s first presidency, he made racist and disturbing comments about colored people. He once condemned a black member in Congress, the late Elia Kamings, as a “bullying”, while describing his area in Baltimore as “the chaos of the rat and rodents” and “a dangerous and dirty place”. Recently, Trump appointed Darine Betty to the position of Foreign Ministry; Beattie was expelled from the first Trump administration, in 2018, to speak at a conference attended by white excellence. Two Musk government employees who made white white comments were found. One of them resigned, and a day later, Musk said he intended to rehabilitate him.
Tesla Musk has faced multiple lawsuits for discrimination in the workplace during the past decade. In 2024, a California state judge spent that a collective lawsuit against the company, which includes nearly six thousand black workers, could proceed to determine Whether it is Tesla “A pattern or failure to take all the reasonable steps needed to prevent discrimination and harassment” at its factory in Frimon. In submitting the original case, I swear the data from more than two hundred black employees and contractors Premium Production floor as a “hotbed for racism”, including writing on fanatic walls and insults. This has led the Federal Employment Opportunities Committee to prosecute Tesla, claiming that the company had subjected black employees at the Frimmte factory “to” severe or widespread racist harassment and created and maintained a hostile work environment based on sweat. ” Last March, a federal judge spent that a lawsuit against EEOC might be filed. (Tesla denied any violations.)
Nearly ten months after filed a lawsuit against EEOC, the Trump administration removed two three Democratic Commissioners at the agency, leaving it without the quorum necessary to work. One of these commissioners was Goslin Samuels, who was appointed by Trump in 2020. He said She was told that she was removed because “embrace me for the radical ideology and my position in Dei and its expansion makes me inappropriate for service.”
EEOC dismantling It seems that achieving a grudge. In other ways, these attacks are an escalation of a long campaign to undermine federal protection against racial discrimination. This was what was important about Trump’s decision to return until 1965 to cancel the executive order of Lindon Johnson. Federalists. Unlike Dei, which is usually voluntary and aims to change the culture of the company or social dynamics, Johnson requires contractors from the private sector to work on behalf of the federal government “to take positive measures to ensure the employment of applicants, and that employees be dealt with during employment, without consideration To their race, belief, color, or national origin.
Months before Johnson signed the executive order, he gave a letter to start at the University of Howard, which emphasized the meaning of the civil rights legislation he was signing in the law, and the additional measures to manage it were to do it. After each step was pushed on the road through the movement of civil rights and the uprisings in Harlem, Philadelphia, Rothsters, and abroad, Johnson linked the voting rights law to his efforts to follow up on legislation that would enhance the economic opportunity for the black people. he Described Freedom “the right to participate and participate in full and equal, in American society – to vote, to make a job to enter a public place, to go to school.” But, he continued, “Freedom is not enough. You do not wipe out centuries scars by saying: Now you are free to go where you want, do as you want, and choose the leaders who please.” In what I consider “the next and most depth stage for the battle for civil rights” Johnson continued, “We are not only striving for freedom but the opportunity. We are not only seeking legal equity but human ability, not only equality as right and theory but equality as truth and equality as a result.”
