Federal judge says results of North Carolina court race with Democrat ahead must be certified

Rally, North Carolina – disputed polls in It is still without a solution 2024 race for Supreme Court seat in North Carolina He must remain in the final census, a federal judge spent late on Monday, a decision that if the adherence would lead to an electoral victory over its democratic work, Alison Reges.

Richard Maires, the American boycott judge, agreed with Reges and others who have argued that it would be a violation of the United States constitution to make recent decisions According to government appeals courts That directed the removal of thousands of polling cards that are likely to be considered unchanging. Myers wrote that the votes cannot be removed six months after the election day without damaging the due legal procedures and equal protection rights of the affected population.

The state election council was also ordered specifically the results that after two of the winner Raghz – with only 734 votes – showed Republican opponent Jefferson Griffin. However, the judge delayed his decisions for seven days in the event of Griffin’s desire to appeal the ruling before the Court of Appeal in the fourth American district.

Follow the coverage of the living policy here

Myers, who was nominated on President Donald Trump’s seat.

More than 5.5 million votes were thrown into the last unspecified race in the general elections in November. Griffin, the same judge of the state’s appeal court, presented official protests after the elections in the hope that removing the ballot cards that he said would turn the result illegally.

“The Griffin’s Legal Team was reviewing the matter of MARES Monday night and evaluating the following steps,” said Griffin’s campaign spokesman Paul Shomker in an email.

Rig was more guaranteed in her statement: “Today, we won. I am proud to continue to support the constitution and the rule of law as a judge in the Supreme Court in North Carolina.”

Griffin wanted to leave Mairez the decisions of the state’s courts without hindrance, which also directed that most of the voters with inappropriate ballot cards get 30 days to provide information for their sweat options in the outcome.

Reges, the government Democratic Party and some affected voters, said that Griffin was trying to change the election result for the year 2024 after the fact that it was removed by the voters who complied with the rules of voting while writing last fall.

Myers wrote that Griffin’s official protests after the elections, which were rejected by the state’s election council, have made efforts to make changes retroactively on the voting laws that would only deprive the voters targeted by Griffin. Griffin’s challenges not to present voters not only define images in more than six democratic biological provinces in the state.

“You create the rules before the game. You don’t change it after the game is over,” Maeers wrote by 68 pages.

“Allowing the parties” to raise the specific rules “of the elections after the elections can only produce” confusion and turmoil “which” threatens “to undermine the beauty of the federal courts, government agencies and the elections themselves,” as he added during the martyrdom of other cases.

Democrats and voting rights groups Alerting the efforts of Griffin. They called it an attack on democracy, which will be a road map of the Republican Party to reflect the election results in other states. The state’s Republican Party said that Griffin is seeking to ensure only legal votes.

One of the voting cards cards announced by the state’s appeals courts violated the state constitution that was made by foreign voters who did not live in the United States, but their parents were declared residents of North Carolina. The state law issued in 2011 authorized these people to vote in the state elections.

The other category covered the military or external voters who have not submitted copies of the identity of the images or an exemption model with the absent ballot cards. The rule of the state exempts them from the condition. The Courts of Appeal allowed the “treatment” of voters who did not provide an identity until their voices are still in the race.

While North Carolina can definitely set rules for the future state elections, what is written by its books, can not be applied after the fact of a selection of voters only.

Griffin made official protests that seemed to cover more than 65,000 ballot cards. This was followed by the rulings of the state court, which was followed by a total of at least 1675 votes or perhaps up to 7000, according to the court files.

Riggs is one of only two Democrats in the Supreme Court of seven members, and will improve the eight years of the party’s efforts to restore a majority in the court later in the contract. Griffin and Rigz did not participate in their trials about their election.