On Wednesday, the Federal Appeal Court left at the place of the minimum ruling that prevented the administration and budget office from a comprehensive freezing age on the federal funding of the states, and wrote that it pose a clear danger to the money -based states.
the resolution It refused a request from the Trump administration to stay to rule Written by Judge John J. McConneel Junior of the Federal Provincial Court of Rod Island County this month. Judge McConnell found that the administration had already destroyed Congress in strangling money in ways that were exposed to state governments at risk and the services they provided to its residents.
The alliance was nearly twenty attorneys of democracy prosecution In January to stop freezing. They argued that funding, including critical relief for disasters spent by the Federal Emergency Management and Education Support Agency in the early childhood provided through Head Start, was suspected of doubt.
In their opinion, a committee of three judges from the American Court of Appeal of the First Circuit wrote that freezing would cause an irreplaceable damage, including division of debts, “obstacles to planning, employment and operations”, and disruption on research projects in state universities.
In its original guidelines, the discussion in the lawsuit, the administration and budget office advised agencies that the stopping depends only on financing currents affected by some of the early orders of President Trump, such as those aimed at ending diversity, fairness, inclusion and climate change funds.
However, the states behind the lawsuit argued that temporary suspension was chaotic and caused a great revolution, preventing them from reaching federal scholarships that seemed to be outside those orders.
For example, in a presentation On Wednesday night, the assistant prosecutor from Illinois said that the state is still unable to achieve money through the program of granting the earthquake’s assistance.
In their opinion, they refused to stay on the prior judge’s order of Judge McConnell, the referees wrote that the states have documented many cases of “stops, freezing, and the sudden completion of binding funds,” which indicates that freezing on federal funds is often not unique. They wrote, that the arbitrary nature of freezing, also suggested that the alliance of states is likely to prevail in the lawsuit.
