The people refusing to use AI

Nothing was persuaded by Sabin Zaeeller of the value of using artificial intelligence.

“I really read a wonderful phrase that says something like” Why would I read something that someone cannot tolerate to write, “and this is a strong statement and is completely compatible with my views.”

Mrs. Zetteleer runs her communications agency in London, with about 10 employees, some part -time part -time.

“What is the purpose of sending something we did not write, reading a newspaper written by robot programs, and listening to a song created by artificial intelligence, or I earn more money by dismissing the official who has four children?

She says: “Where is joy, love, or ambitious improvement even for me as a founder in that? This does not mean anything to me.”

Mrs. Zetteleer is among those who resist the invasion of artificial intelligence, which really happened with Chatgpt launch At the end of 2022.

Since then, the service has become, and many of its competitors have become common. Chatgpt exceeds five billion visits per month, According to Simrosh software.

But training in artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGPT requires huge amounts of energy, and as soon as they are trained, keeping them also operates intense energy.

While it is difficult to determine the electricity used by artificial intelligence, A report issued by Goldman Sachs It is estimated that the Chatgpt query uses approximately 10 times the electricity such as Google Search Inquiries.

This makes some people uncomfortable.

For Florence Ashiri, the owner of yoga has declined and more, the environmental impact is one of the reasons that make it undertake to stay away from artificial intelligence.

Another London -based says: “My first reaction was that artificial intelligence without a soul is contradictory to my work, which is everything about the human relationship.”

“However, I discovered that the environmental impact was terrible with all the energy consumption required to operate databases. I don’t think people realize it.”

While Ms. Zetteleer admits that she respects the artificial intelligence of all social commodities that she can achieve, she says that she is concerned about the broader influence on society.

“I am happy with the presence of artificial intelligence for the blind if they can get artificial artificial intelligence articles and anything really is really useful. But in general, I don’t think he will benefit us in the long run.”

Is it concerned that it has an impact on its business, especially if the competing companies are using artificial intelligence?

“Like everything, I can save money by sending our agent to Milan on Easyjet trips instead of the train.

“Indeed, my profit margins seem unsuccessful if this is the way you measure success, but what if success is measured by how easy you are in society and how well you sleep well?”

Sierra Hansen, who lives in Seattle and works in public affairs, also refuses to use artificial intelligence. For her, she is concerned that the use of artificial intelligence harms our ability to solve the problem.

“Our brain is the thing that helps to organize what our days seem, and not to go to Copilot intelligence and ask him to tell it how to manage my work schedule.

“Our mission as a person is to apply critical thinking skills, and if you are feeding simple tasks in Chatgpt, you are not solved alone. It is thinking for you. If you want to listen to music, you do not need Amnesty International to create an ideal rock album for me.”

But not everyone has the luxury of withdrawal from artificial intelligence.

Jackie Adams (not her real name), who works in digital marketing, initially resisted artificial intelligence on environmental foundations, and because she believed that its use was lazy.

“I heard about the energy needed for the data centers and the quantity they take, and he did not sit with me properly. I did not understand why we need it,” she says.

However, about a year ago, her three colleagues at the marketing company she works in her to adopt artificial intelligence began for tasks such as writing texts and generating ideas.

Six months ago, Mrs. Adams was forced to follow her, after she was told that she had to reduce her budget.

“Then it was outside my control,” she says. She feels that continuing to resist would hurt her career.

“I started playing with her a little more after reading the job descriptions of the experience of artificial intelligence. I recently realized that if I didn’t implement it in my work methods, I will fail to knee.”

She says now, she does not see use of artificial intelligence anymore.

“It can raise my work and make some things better,” adding that it uses it to improve the work of writing texts and editing photo.

James Proso, a professor of philosophy specializing in artificial intelligence ethics at the University of Pace in New York, says that the moment of participation in artificial intelligence has already passed.

“If you want to know the reason for making a decision, we will need humans. If we do not care about it, we may use artificial intelligence,” he says.

“Therefore, we will have human judges for criminal cases, and human doctors to make decisions about who should get a transplant. But the weather will soon be predictable, and also anesthesia,” says Professor Prussio.

Mrs. Adam has accepted the use of artificial intelligence at work, but she still feels despair of the growing impact of artificial intelligence.

“Even when you do a search in Google, it includes an artificial intelligence overview, while some emails have a summary of the upper line, so now it seems that we have no control. How can I stop all this? It is a snowball.”