during Meta Anti -Monopathic CourtLawyers representing Apple, Google and Table freedom I found that it contains It is easy to re -remove updates. Apple and Snap’s lawyers have launched “eggyious” mistakes, where Apple representative indicates that he may not be able to trust internal information in the future. Google’s lawyer blamed Meta to enhance the search giant data with error.
Details about lawyers’ comments Come from freedomLauren WinnerWhich is currently in the courtroom where the procedures are caused today. Apple, Google and Meta did not respond immediately freedomRequest to comment. Snap refused to comment.
Snap lawyer cleared the “Cavalier approach and informal ignorance” of other companies, and asked whether “META had applied meaningful operations if its own information was at stake.” The Meta Mark Hansen lawyer suggested that a third -party unveiled in the trial team to work on Redaceches.
Even before the discovery of the Redncions case, Snap was upset with what he called the secret information that was shared during the opening data. (The company did not specifically specify the information that it considered secret.)
As for the reason why Meta Snap is not allowed to know that it will include information, Hansen said he does not want to give the company heads about what it offers in the experiment because “it is very clear that Snap is working with FTC. Snap is a major competitor.”
Although it is clearly revised for some reason, as they shared information from within other companies that were not intended for public viewing, the non -classified documents did not particularly reveal exciting information. One of the two clip stated that iPhone users tend to prefer the Apple messaging app for the Meta and Snap, while another chip, named “Snapchat in 2020, indicated the competitor’s competitor and not just identification applications”, that its competitors, including Meta and Tiktok applications, “prosperous”.
For capture and other companies, the juice details were not the point. Snap lawyer, Meta’s main lawyer, has publicly accused Snap’s competitive assessments that should have been special.
