How Musk and Trump Are Working to Consolidate Government Data About You

Privacy advocates say that all these data can enable the government to punish its political opponents by arming information about the personal life of the individual (bankruptcy, criminal history, medical demands) or stopping the benefits they receive (housing vouchers, retirement checks, and food assistance).

Actor Jimmy Raskin, Democrat Maryland, said: “They did not show a single case in which fraud was required to discover some global government access to everyone’s data,” said actor Jimmy Raskin, Democrat Maryland. “In fact, the creation of a unified database for the monster will be for all information about all citizens to call for fraud and political revenge against the people.”

This is how personal data is followed and used in authoritarian states, as Mr. Raskin added. Both Russia China Inventory data on its citizens to track opponents and squash opposition to the ruling party in the government.

The White House refused to process how to protect the data and use it directly to unify it, including whether the administration is trying to create a single central database, indicating only its focus on fraud.

“Waste, fraud, and abuse were very solid in our broken system for a very long time,” White House spokesman Harrison Fields said in a statement. “It takes direct access to the system to determine and fix it.”

Technicians warn that trying to match complex data groups to make decisions on government programs – including using artificial intelligence to determine waste in government spending, as did the musk allies. discussion -It can produce rampant errors and damages in the real world.

National security experts note that a large group of data about American citizens will be an attractive target for enemy, infiltrators, and electronic criminals. US officials have said that the countries that include China, Russia and Iran are behind the major violations of US government databases in recent years.

Private companies and data brokers who buy and sell data know a lot about Americans, too. But there is an important difference in what the federal government can do alone with these data, says privacy advocates. Google does not control the migration enforcement device. The goal does not have the ability to stop social security payments.

“This reaches an essential point about privacy: not only a matter,” said John Defison, director of litigation at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, who filed a lawsuit against the administration in banning Dog’s access to financial statements in the treasury and the federal labor forces at the Personnel Management Office. “It is an issue from This knows about me, and what can they do legally – or as a practical issue – with this information? “