MThe people I know were concerned about the possibility of Trump’s second presidency; But we had no vote. However, these Republicans, who elected him, should realize the ancient Chinese proverb: Be careful of what you wanted.
A classic example was recently presented in columns New York Times. On December 17, the right -wing bumper writer Brett Stevens books: “Here is an idea for Trump’s permanent critics, including our right on the right. Let’s enter the new year … by dropping the comparisons harmful to the former dictators, by not coldly with great greatness about … the end of democracy continuously.”
However, by February 20, with Trump, JD Vance and Elon Musk they are already giving a complete vent to their planned revolution, Mr. Stevens quoted what Joseph Jobils was He wrote in April 1928, about five years before Hitler’s rise to power: “We enter the Regestag to arm ourselves with democracy weapons … if democracy is fool … enough … this is her problem. It does not matter to us. Any way to bring the revolution is good from us.”
There is a lot to worry, on a lot of fronts. The United States must live with the monster he elected; Unfortunately, as well as for us, is not the least of which are millions in the least fortunate countries who depend on American foreign aid, and the most advanced economies that are concerned about the right effect of Trump’s dedication to tariff wars.
It was clear that it was fear of Trump, or not, In Ukraine And on the future of NATO, which dominated the reports on Care Starmer’s visit to the White House Last week. But Starmer has another important concern: Hope that all these things about the “special relationship”, Trump’s supposed respect for British ownership – and I do not bother you, Trump loves her that Starmer is “sir” – will qualify the UK to stay on “the bench” regarding the wars of collective tariffs.
It is difficult to believe that Starmer’s hasty advertisement for a long increase in the defense budget was not driven by a desire to expose Trump; Likewise, it was certain that this was supposed to be funded by a significant reduction in the UK’s foreign aid budget would lead to the admiration of the president who was on his way to doing the same with American aid.
I am afraid that there will be another motivation, and more aims at the UK voters. This disappointing government, which came to expect two differences, is afraid of the Islah party, and even many of their supporters do not like foreign aid or immigration.
However, with the difficulty of the economy, and many employers who suffer from a scarcity in the European Union for European Union Workers-is not necessarily permanent immigrants, but those who are used to moving through the channel to carry out construction work-the advisor’s growth program in a dilemma.
It is also its financial rules. At the expense of the ridiculous desire to adhere to this self -burden, the Prime Minister and the advisor decided to finance an increase in Defense budget by raiding the aid budget. We were told that they are afraid of the reaction of the bond markets, but I am ready to bet that the participants in the bond markets will understand the need for a problem in the designated bonds to defend at this time of the crisis caused by Putin.
This leads us to Putin and Trump’s joint achievement in making European countries closer. One of them was hoping that this was the last nail in the coffin of Britain’s exit from the European Union, but Trump is still trying to divide and rule. With due respect – difficult! To Trump and his partners, Vans and Musk, was not the European Union.It was formed to install it in the United States: His presence, which was warmed by American politicians from a different dish of Trump, has what he justifies now so that he is not drunk through a strange alliance from Trump and Putin.
But despite the clear need of the United Kingdom to recognize its need for the European Union’s membership, Trump is still trying to put a key on business. On Friday, he talked about a special commercial deal with the United Kingdom, but this idea was examined before and this deal will not be for the benefit of the United Kingdom.
Trump, like his doubtful friend, was in favor of Britain’s exit from the European Union, and the game he plays is not in the interest of the United Kingdom. Unfortunately, in Starmer’s despair to avoid 25 % tariff With Trump threatens the European Union, Starmer plays in the hands of Trump.
Meanwhile, I lost the number of people who met with great hopes in this work government, but who are very disappointed. Red lines on the European Union; Discounts in fuel payments in the winter; He refused to raise the maximum child on the benefits; And now rational and misleading discounts on external aid. Hey Timpurra, O customs …
