Drake has amended the defamation lawsuit against the World Music Group to refer to the performance of “Kendrick Lamar” in Super Bowl.
In February, the Lamar show achieved a decisive success, and according to what was reported, the first most exhibited half in the history of the event was. Many fans wondered how he dealt with “not like us”, a Grammy -winning Diss path, which includes, among his exciting words, a famous line accusing Drake of homosexuality.
Lamar changed that lyric in his performance, which Drake cited in his modified suit. Lamar performed other critical words, including the line “I hear you love” Young “.
Drake’s lawyers wrote in their amended complaint: “Kindrik Lamar was not allowed to perform while performing Super Bowl unless the word” gay children “(in the phrase” the scene of accredited children “) was not deleted from the lyrics of songs. “This is because everyone almost realizes that he is from the defamation of the wrong mark, a” sexual sexual “.
The Drake team said in its average deposit: “The word” homosexual “monitoring agreement failed to treat Super Bowl’s performance to transfer the Central Central Meaning of Registration.” “Instead, Super Bowl has strengthened the public’s belief in the truth of allegations against Drake.”
“This was the first, and we hope that the last show will be, Super Bowl, who was coordinated to assassinate another artist’s character,” the complaint continued.
Drake was sued UMG first, as everyone and Emmar are signed, three months ago (although he did not charge Lamar directly), accusing the sign of promoting anyone who is believed to be
“Drake undoubtedly one of the most accomplished artists in the world and whom we enjoyed with a successful relationship for 16 years, is misleading by his legal representatives to take a silly legal step after another.” “We will prove that all the remaining claims are inevitably. It is disgraceful for these foolish and ventilation legal plays to continue. It is a financial reputation and expensive for DRIC and they have no opportunity to succeed.”
In response to the discovery movement that can allow Drake access to a Lamar contract with UMG, the company said: “Two weeks ago, its representatives celebrated“ victory ”: granting a routine discovery movement. This“ victory ”will become a loss if this trivial and fully reckless lawsuit is not fully dropped because Drake will be subject to the population.
“Be careful what you wish,” they added.
Ken White, a well -known first amendment, said the first famous person, who is the well -known first amendment Talk to the Times In January.
“There is a danger, but it seems low because of the way Drake decided to do this,” said White. “He went intentionally after UMG, and said that this is not related to Kendrick. It was more like,” I don’t want to choose a battle with Kendrick, I just want to choose a battle with UMG. “Everything he could do is say,” UMG upgraded this song in Super Bowl, their hands got Kendrick Lamar Gig. “
