“It’s not being looked at as a crazy thing”: Emboldened Republicans renew push to restrict divorce

as Trump The operational administration continues the controversial executive procedures targeting the federal protection of marginalized Americans, legislators at the state level another shot. DivorceRenewing calm efforts so far to transform a marginal idea – restricting Americans’ ability to obtain divorce – in a possible fact in the most conservative states.

in Oklahoma Last month, the state member of the state submitted for the second time a draft law seeking to remove “incompatibility” from the reasons for divorce, with a suggestion of separate legislation that provides tax credit to encourage marriage marriages, which makes it more difficult for husbands to obtain divorce. In Indiana, the Mood Bill is now aimed at adding an obstacle to married couples with young children looking for divorce on hidden land.

The last bills that target divorce come without an error against the background of a large number of executive procedures at the federal level to threaten civil rights and Freedoms For a group of Americans. While these state laws had previously failed to obtain any traction in the legislative bodies of each of them-the Republican Senator’s attempt in Oklahoma in Oklahoma in 2024 failed to eliminate more limit women’s rights.

In the post-stage-Dobbs The United States, legal experts find such anxious possibility.

Maria Zog, a professor of marital law at the Faculty of Law at the University of South Carolina, told a salon that she expects more of this type of legislation in the coming years due to its spread. Although these current bills are not popular, their failures do not discourage legislators in other states of making similar proposals.

“It is not seen as a crazy thing.” “Some cases there do it. Let’s think about it, and we may want to suggest it, and perhaps pass – maybe he will not do it.” But if the countries suggest more and more, some countries will pass them.

Divorce laws without error for couples allow them to be divided without the need to prove the husband’s mistake in the trial. Often a single -side divorce, which states that only one husband must apply to start the process, provides divorce without an ease of ending in the end of marriage while maintaining the already of the disruption of the family court system.

In 1969, then California Governor Ronald Reagan began to divorce without an error in a wave of extension from other countries that adopt “incompatibility” as reasons for divorce over the next twenty years. Although the matter came besides the expansion of the social and political force of women during the second wave of feminism, the divorce without a mistake was initially arose to defend the safety of the family court system from fraud and falsehood as fabricated husbands evidence of the error to prove that they were entitled to divorce.

Modern Opponents, who include men’s rights activists and bitten shepherds, argue that eliminating the justification of innovation will in turn enhance families and traditional values, which reduces the risk of harming children with controversial divorce procedures.

SB 829Oklahoma’s bill without error, is part of a list of eight pieces of suggestions that Senator Davir is “restoring moral reasoning in Oklahoma.” This will end the divorce in the state while allowing divisions in cases of “abandonment”, including “usual sugar”, “serious neglect of duty”, “severe cruelty”, “adultery” and “unknown pregnancy”. For couples with minor children, the draft law will also require the external parent to create an accessible tribe when the child reaches adulthood as a form of compensation for divorce.

In addition to his proposal to eliminate divorce without error, Deevers presented another bill that provides tax credit worth $ 2500 as a motivation to choose the marriage of the covenant, and a restricted marriage contract preferred by right -wing Christian groups that create barriers to divorce such as the required guidance and the justified limits applied. Only a few states that offer the Zoys of the Covenant – Louisiana, Arkansas and Arizona – are widely unpopular.

Zog said that the reasons for the “severe cruelty” raised by the draft law are what raises its concern because of his ambiguity and we included that unlimited cruelty will not be sufficient reasons for divorce.

She said: “One of the concerns of getting rid of divorce without trouble is that it will increase domestic violence because many people who are fired under theoretical in theory will have reasons because they are hurt.” “But there are a lot of problems in an attempt to get divorce based on the physical cruelty that people do not do. So here, not only they must pass all of this, they will have to show that he is extremist – and what does this mean?

Marilyn Shintz, veteran divorce lawyer in Blanc Rome in New York, has put a sign of the Deever’s Bill ‘Bill’ The incentive for marriage.

“In my opinion, the state completely exceeds its borders” in proposing such legislation. “Whether you have children or not, you must have the same right to get a divorce. There should be no burden or obstacles to you to end the marriage.”

A DEEVERS or Senator spokesman did not respond to the same comment requests.

Deever, in January press release Upon announcing the bills, he argued that the draft law not errors raises the marriage file by making it meaningful and binding with the protection of the right of people to leave abusive husbands.

He said: “A society that teaches and allows the index of marriage to be less important and binding in the work contract. It will reap the fruits of social disturbances, the infidelity of the unrestricted trust, crime, violence towards women, war against men, and exhaust children.”

Indiana Timothy Wesco also stressed the impact of divorce on children, although he only tried to complicate the divorce without a mistake for couples with minor children. Under his leadership now invoiceAt least one of the two parties looking for divorce on the reasons for “collapse that cannot be re -certified” must provide a witness who can witness to confirm the collapse. The legislation also set restrictions on those who could be this witness, and naming as acceptable individuals responsible for marriage, the father or party’s brother, and a religious leader on the knowledge of marriage among others.

Unlike Oklahoma’s proposal, the Indiana bill was trying to implement the “stumbling block”, Zog said. She said that the assumption behind this is that “if you have to bring a third party to agree with you that this marriage cannot be preserved, then you are less likely to divorce.”

While she said she did not find this assumption “it is likely to be true”, “ She added that the draft law could be a step towards further attacking the lack of innovation in the future.

However, Joanna Grossman, professor of Family Law at SMU Deedman College, said that despite the possible WESCO intention, in practice, it is unlikely to have any concrete impact on the divorce process. If it is implemented before, it is possible that the divorce will continue just as they do now with the addition of a third party that provides a written certificate to witness the foundations.

“This rule does not apply except in divorce on supernatural land, and therefore it testifies to anything.” “They bear witness that the person who submitted a divorce request believes that marriage is over. It is not an objective fact.”

Indiana’s house Vote The Wesco Bill, a week after its presentation in late January, because its submission violated the rules of the legislative body that govern the number of proposals that the legislator can submit during one legislative session. During the death of this session, the draft law can theoretically return to the state legislature.

A salon asked a Wesco spokesman whether the legislator has plans to re -submit the bill or similar legislation. This spokesperson told the salon that he would pass the questions to an Indiana representative. Wesco did not respond by late Tuesday afternoon.

Wesco He said In late January to x, the bill was submitted after watching parents, “They shoot the lives of their children and destroy the lives of their children while they claim their marriage mutually.”

However, Shintz argued that these types of bills will have a similar effect on children and fail to protect children in the way they started. She said that increasing the time spent in a “weak situation” with parents in an unhappy marriage “can be very dangerous for them and their children.

“It is dangerous, and it has a tremendous negative and negative impact,” Shintz said of legislation aimed at no mistake. “I think it will be very expensive – costly, financial and costly because it will force people to stay in dangerous situations. Let’s face it, the victims will be less likely to report domestic violence, and prolong the divorce process – what a terrible impact on children.”

Deee’s and Wesco bills are far from the first proposals to divorce laws without error.

Deever was introduced for the first time legislation In an attempt to strike a “incompatibility” of the reasons for divorce in the state in 2024, and the Republican Republican representative in South Dakota, Tony Randolph presented a similar bill every year between 2020. Or cut the reasons for divorce without error, with the Republican parties in Texas and Nebraska Including guidance for potential legislation in their latest platforms.

These bills, in the event of their success at all, threaten people in abusive and violent relationships while reducing the arrival of low -income Americans to divorce, Katie Delex, CEO of the Callouta Da’aoma, arriving at the arrival of justice.

“When we look at this stadium to reduce divorce rates, it really offers not to understand what the actual causes and those who contribute to the high divorce rates in Oklahoma, which are unsafe families and unnecessary living conditions,” Delix said of the invoice on the bill. Telephone interview.

Oklahoma, which has one of The highest divorce rates In the nation, it also has some of the highest rates of the country Intimate partner and House violence murders. Delix pointed out that Oklahuanis also face procedural and legal barriers in front of obtaining divorce, such as the lack of specific unified models for the court.

“If we move on to a system that requires proof of error and a complete trial, it will be a great burden on our courts and also on Oclawan people who need to reach this to stay safe.”

Dilks and Grossman said that in the current political climate, they do not expect these laws to gain any dangerous attraction in the legislative bodies of the state. While Dilks said that the Trump administration may work as a kind of back wind of right -wing legislators who follow this legislation, it is not sure whether “it will mainly change the paths and results of those bills.”

“I think it is just the hatred of the standard women of the province. There is nothing special about these bills,” Grossman added. “They seem to agree with people who want to take symbolic measures that praise their good and conservative jokes, or they really want the trap of women in marriage.”

I also argued that the level of social disorder caused by the current administration’s actions makes it likely that these types of legislation are seriously submitted because they, in comparison, may appear as “trivial deviations.”

“At the same time, the great image distraction may mean that people can not really pay attention to the small things that will actually cause a lot of harm and will not get the attention they deserve from opponents,” she said. .