Entertainment

Justin Baldoni & Blake Lively Battle Escalates With New Misconduct Claims

Earlier this year, a federal judge called on various bitter and large dollars calling for lawsuits between Blake Blake and Justin Balouni On what happened while making End with us And the release of the film mainly “A dispute between public relations companies.”

It was found again in early March, Judge Louis J. Lyman only looks at the tip of a possible iceberg. It turns out a lawyer Bian Friedman He agrees with the judge, even if he is not in the way in which Judge Leman means.

“We have just started scratching a wider and more treacherous plan.” Stephanie Jones Strike the court cage. “To be clear, Jones and Junsorx are involved evenly in this misconduct.”

On the other hand, Johnse Christine’s lawyer, Talha, says that this is the last step by the Balouni team and the fact that it does not modify their initial complaints of $ 400 million at the present time proving this is nothing more than a shell game. “The reversal of the path, the dropping of the claims that were previously described, the submission of new evidence, and the extinguish of the longest and most confusing statement in the world – what a desperate trick by the team that all admits to it is in trouble.” “Behind their empty storms, you will even find an attempt to defend the wrongful acts of evidence.

What he says in both cases is that Days after the call of a call under the summons of the radar from Lively appeared last summerA series of new deposits and counter -allegations late Thursday from Baldouni, Advertisement Jennifer Abel, Melissa Nathan and others who throw much more than shade in another simple star. Incurred Ryan ReynoldsThe propaganda of the couple, Leslie Sloan and the New York Times, went on the authority and Faridman went on a completely new level against his former client, even in this case.

Starting with the sexual complaint of harassment and revenge it was submitted by Lively on December 20 with the Civil Rights Administration in California And NYT is shown the next day IEWU And an alleged online swab campaign by Baldoni to Aastroturf, especially the actress, the heart of the prominent conflict of both sides was apparently text messages and other correspondence from ABEL and Nathan. Therefore, it was long known that the texts, etc. arose from the cell phone of ABEL when they got out of Joneswork last summer. It was also long for a long time that Jones handed the compact materials due to a summons.

Until last week, the origin of this summons was unknown.

Now, a little more than a year from the date of the experimental start on March 9, 2026, it is clear that the summons came from a procedure last September, after the box office was hit IEWU For the first time, from a company called Vanzan against 10 whose name is not mentioned. But how did they know that they go to the Stephanie Jones and his cell phone?

“The plaintiff is informed and believed, and it is approved, that the fake lawsuit was fabricated by the vital parties and Jones, who act at the concert, to facilitate the launch of Jones and cover up the data that was extracted from Abel and her personal accounts under the abuse of the review, without giving up the relevant parties, such as ABEL, which can interfere in the abuse of the abuse.” The former right -hand lady in a prepared suit and a modified answer to the previous suit in late last year.

Blake Livley and Justin intuitively in End with us

Sony

In the aftermath of the Federal Court, Friedman said at the deadline: “In light of the disclosure of new evidence almost daily, it became necessary to amend our counter -claims against Stephanie Jones and Junsorx.”

As a vitality and here dead pool The wife of the two stars Reynolds walked on the red carpet at the 2025 time party on Thursday in jazz at the Lincoln Center, and Friedman added: “We are not surprised at all that Mrs. Jones will direct her legal team until she is recorded by reading by the group that uses reading from the fan. Its campaign in distorting it, and deliberately defrauding the natural procedures for inappropriate purposes by creating a comic complaint with a prosecutor who has nothing to do with and without a named defendant, which guarantees that no one knows or objects to their attempt to obtain the information he did not enjoy.

“To suggest-as Vanzan (vital and Rynolds) does in their secret complaint”-they are not aware of the identities of their employees, and the two participants continue to say “a complete joke.”

“We repeat once again that there is no distortion campaign and has never been, with the exception of the vital parties and Mrs. Jones in cooperation with the New York Times. We will continue the battle to expose and hold the violators and reveal the truth.”

Lawyer Brian Friedman. (Photo by Sarah Rangeluz, Los Angeles Daily News/SCNG)

In only the new part of the modified complaint, counter -claims from Freedman and other lawyers for Baldoni, WHYFARER studios go, perceive, and advertise the state:

Accordingly, on September 27, 2024, work began in a glove with Jones and Junsorx, the vital parties and its lawyer in Manet, Phelps & Phillips, LLP (“Manattt”), trick legal procedures in the New York State Court, Vanzan, Inc. Against 1-10. The fake suit was nothing more than just a transparent trick to obtain a summons authority. Prosecutor, Vanzan, Inc. (“Vanzan”), is an entity for Lively and Reynolds inactive and is not fully associated with the movie or parties. The lawsuit confirms three reasons for the work: violating the contract, violating the implicit era of goodwill and fair dealing, and an unbelievable servant against the defendants in the Ministry of Energy only. The case does not explain how Vanzan was unable to identify the appropriate defendants, especially in the context of violating the contract.

Instead, Vanzan (Lively, Reynolds) and Manatt are unreasonably claimed that they were not familiar with their own interview identities, “its employees, contractors, agents, or actors[.]”The lawsuit is free from specific allegations against anyone, much less than Abel, by relying exclusively on the generalized recitations of the legal terms of idiots. In particular, Vanzan has never requested the appointment of the judge, or the replacement of the defendants in December, or with participation in December. CRD complaint against it against Wayfarer parties.

On the same day that the lawsuit was filed, on September 27, 2024, Jones warned an employee to leave for ABEL because “her work will not be present for a longer period.”

ABEL’s modified deposit passes that the former propaganda in the field of work and other organs in the Baldoni inner circle had no idea about the lawsuit or summons, because they claim that it was the intention of Team Blake.

As is planned by the parties, upon receipt of the Ministry’s summons, on or around October 1, 2024, Jones and Jensorx fully surrendered the contents of APHO timeCreate a crust of legitimacy and supply Jones and Jonesworks Denibility as soon as the New York Times came to vitality. In this peak, Jones and Junsorx’s lawyer later described the response to “a summons from the court”.

While this new front in the battle between Lively and WME, Baldoni is raised, and both themselves are trying to reject them from Virgin Jin Actor $ 400 million, defamation and blackmail. There are no promises, but do not be surprised if you see the gray phase that comes out of the Soon-RISH stage.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button