newYou can now listen to Fox News!
Legislators are concerned about a fragile ceasefire between Israel Iran may not withstand, but many of them are not ready to call for the regime to change the Islamic Republic.
president Donald Trump It announced on Monday that Israel and Iran have agreed to a truce, but with the continuation of the evening in the early hours of Tuesday morning, whether this peace will happen.
Trump was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for the ceasefire deal in Iran, Israel
President Donald Trump comes out in Israel and Iran with profanity to break the ceasefire. (Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
According to what was reported, Israel had prepared to commit a retaliatory bombing against IranTrump accused both the newborn. On Tuesday morning, the President put a sharp reprimand against the two countries.
He told reporters: “We have two countries fighting for a long time and so arduous that they do not know what to do.”
In the Capitol Hill, following the announcement of the immediate ceasefire, legislators were already looking into the deal in a skeptical way, but they were confident that the president’s negotiating authority would ensure that the fragile truce was not destroyed.
“I am still optimistic,” the deputy. Nancy SiljalTell RS.C. Fox News Digital. “I trust the president. He was right in everything, and he is the only president who was able to bring Iran and Israel to the table in this way. So I will wish to pray that this works, and if he does not do that, we know that Trump will act decisively.”
Representative Nancy Mac, RS.C. (Representative Nancy Mac, RS.C.)
Trump’s announcement came in the wake of the weekend strikes with bombs that penetrate the basement that the Iranian nuclear program says. Many legislators stood last week that the complete goal of Israel’s support in their campaign to bomb against the Islamic Republic is to ensure that Iran cannot grant or obtain an atomic weapon.
Senator Eric SchmidtR-MO told, Fox News Digital that it was the main work that Trump laid down in his first term with the Ibrahim agreement and his last visit to Saudi Arabia, which could help promote the permanent ceasefire between the two sides.
“All you can do is just confidence in that because of the events that occurred, I mean, Iran … their traditional weapons were destroyed, and their platforms have been removed,” he said. “Their nuclear program was blurred. So they are on the table because of this.”
Senator John Hoffen, RN.D, Fox News Digital told Iran that “usually do what they said they would do.”
However, he believed that with pressure from both the United States and Israel, and because Trump was ready to use the force – which he described as the president who explains that he “means work” – things could be different.
“I think they will come to the table now, and they are in a very weak position, so it is different, but their record is very bad,” he said. “You cannot rely on what they say. So this is due to” Reagan’s confidence “but check.” You must check anything we negotiate with them, and certainly so you will deal with the administration. “
However, even a ceasefire, the Iranian regime is still unchanged. However, the common feelings between many legislators were that if a change in the system occurred in Tehran, it should be left to the Iranian people, not the American government.
Senator in Virginia Tim Kane, who is pushing for his powers’s decision to obtain a vote in the upper room, warned, “Do we really want to get another war to change the regime?
“We changed the Iranian regime in 1953 by leading a coup against the Prime Minister,” Kane said. “This is one of the reasons why the United States’ relationship is very bad after 70 years. Do we really want to do it again?”
The expert says that Trump “does not need permission” from Congress to strike Iran
Senator Steve Denz speaks at the Dirksen Office building in the Senate on January 15, 2025, in Washington, DC (Kevin Lietsch/Getty Images)
Indeed, the US -backed overthrow of the then -Minister, Mohamed Musaddig, Bab Shah, Muhammad Reza Bagdafi, opened to control Iran. However, by 1979, the Islamic Revolution occurred and removed the authority of power and witnessed the birth of the current regime.
Representative Jacques Bergman, retired naval general, has placed his position against regime change in more positive conditions. “This is not our role.”
Senator Steve Denz, R. Mont, praised the president’s work during the weekend and said he believed that strikes had conducted negotiations on a road that could lead to a “transformation between generations” with regard to future peace of the Middle East and Western.
However, he pointed out that “system changes can break a road or two, but it will be difficult to do worse than it is today.”
“I am optimistic about caution, but we are not there yet.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
Not every legislator shared the same feelings.
Representative Ryan Zenk, RR Mont, told the United States that he believed the United States should take a stronger position when it comes to changing the regime in Iran.
“I am a marine seal leader who spent time there, and many of my friends were buried,” he said. “Although the attack was great, it was deceptive, and I gave a statement, etc., etc., I don’t think Iran will bend. I think it will take the regime’s change.”
