Ministers have ‘maxed out’ health service funding, says NHS England boss | NHS

The ministers have “a maximum” amount of money they can provide to NHS and will not get great increases in financing it due to narrow financial affairs, head of the new health service in England He said.
Sir Jim Maki, who took over as a position NHS The CEO of England said last month that the state of public financial affairs means that the country is no longer able to withstand spending.
“We have been greatly placed on what is affordable. It’s really now [the NHS] Maki, who replaced him Amanda Bretshard. “The financial thing is always with us [in the NHS]. There is not enough money for health care. NHS is a large part of public spending now. “
His comments came in a speech to health journalists, a question and answers session at an event in London on Thursday organized by the Association of Medical Journalists.
Mackey’s notes – the accountant before joining NHS – can indicate that the health service will not receive a significant increase in reviewing comprehensive spending next month.
Rachel Reeves, Chancellor, will reveal the review-which determines government spending for a period of three years between 2026-27 and 2029-30-on June 11. In its first budget last October, NHS in England granted an additional 22 billion pounds for 2024-25 and the current fiscal year.
Maki’s realism about NHS’s funding prospects may also predict the amount of money that NHS must fulfill ambitious plans to reform the service that will be determined in the imminent health plan of the 10 -year government.
The document, which is placed by a team of advisers to the Minister of Health, Wes Streeting, will be published in early July, near the 77th anniversary of the establishment of NHS in 1948 by the work government after the war.
Makki also defended the cuts in the NHS 215 budgets, which The higher numbers warned on Friday It was “water”, and it will lead to the closure of services and discounts to employment. They are the result of a brutal “financial reset” for the service he requested in March.
Without such a difficult procedure, NHS was likely to overlook 6.6 billion pounds this year, although its budget is about 200 billion pounds. “[There was] The shock he created [in Whitehall]The anxiety that was created, [and] Anxiety about what this means to the economy, and [with] The international instability we have, what it means to the broader society. “
After promoting the newsletter
NHS leaders have also warned that while they are interested in the financial restrictions through which they work, diving in public satisfaction must be their primary concern. Only 21 % of people are satisfied with NHS, The latest survey of British social situations Last month, revealed.
Maki added: “The thing that we should really bothered to is to explore British social positions in all of this. It was really terrible last year. [when satisfaction was 23%]. We all thought that we had reached the bottom, and then it worsened in the latest. This was a really great shock; A really large sign that we are at risk of losing this relationship with the public. [That] We will lose it correctly. We are really serious. “
It seems that Maki also differs with the description of the routine street of NHS as “broken” because of his inability to continue providing rapid care due to years of neglect in the shadow of conservatives. Maki replied that although “it is extremely easy to generalize that all this is broken and failed”, in his opinion, the service “still provides real global care”, although there is a wide-rang-on-and-“and” completely unacceptable “-in the quality of the care patients he received.