While President Donald Trump is moving at an angry pace to carry out his agenda, federal courts are fighting to stop work that may be illegal. This dynamic has reached another chaos at the end of last week, as the Trump administration is seeking to strengthen its policy of mass deportations.
Over the course of 24 hours, the arrests, deportation, lawsuit, and the apparent wandering of a foreign leader, lawyers and judges have included responding to the administration’s efforts to remove immigrants who claim to be particularly dangerous.
What happened exactly is still unclear. But the events represent the new – constitutional and constitutional dynasties – which are placed on US judges and courts.
Why did we write this
While President Trump is implementing his agenda at lightning speed, an increasing number of judges tell him to respond to these procedures so that lawsuits can be heard. To date, the orders of mixed responses from the executive branch are drawn.
In two cases, the court orders did not reach the prevention of the White House from temporarily to prevent the deportation of the White House, at best, at the appropriate time. In the worst case, court orders were ignored. Judges in both cases work now through details, but legal experts say any scenario has worrying effects.
Daniel Farper, a professor at the University of California, Law College in Berkeley, says the Trump administration “has already taken the slogan” move quickly and break things. “
He adds that this led to some losses in court, but “even if they are finally told to stop what they are doing, or to reverse what they do, only the fact that they did this has an effect.”
Decline from the chief judge Roberts
While President Trump’s administration moves quickly and things are broken, observers are concerned that the balance of power can be among those things that are broken.
“The courts will not prevent us,” Tom Human, the “border border” of Mr. Trump in Fox News. interview Earlier this week, which sparked alarm bells. “We will make this country safe again.”
Then President Trump followed Mr. Human with a call on Tuesday to a judge against his administration to be isolated – the fourth judge To face accountability threats After the ruling against Trump’s policies. In a rare general reprimand of the president, US President John Roberts, John Roberts, fired: “For more than two centuries, it has been proven that the dismissal is not an appropriate response to the dispute over the judicial decision.”
The issue of courts that maintain the current administrative and legal status has arisen, while the Trump administration procedures were met in many cases, including those related to Lebanese work holder Visa, Venezuelan immigrants, federal employees who opened fire, and contractors who owe complete work.
While the initial provisions were exposed to him this week, and while there were questions about whether federal officials had complied, Mr. Trump could still prevail in the end. But Mr. Human’s comments after a Dramatic weekend indicate that the rulers need to check carefully.
Quick removal operations
On March 15, the federal government deported more than 200 immigrants to El Salvador, including some Venezuelan who claim the government members Treen de Aragoa (TDA), a violent gang founded in 2014 in the Venezuelan prison.
The deportations were quickly deported after President Trump called for the law of foreign enemies earlier that day. In 1798, this law allows the president to deport unilateral citizens in a war with the United States, and Mr. Trump claimed that TDA “is taking an irregular war against the United States. A lawsuit defies that claim that followed, which was submitted by five alleged TDA members. But during a hearing That night in the case in Washington, two planes full of immigrants left Texas and began to fly south.
Later that evening – after, It seemsJudge James Basburg temporarily prevented the deportation and ordered the government to invite the aircraft carried out – the two planes landed in El Salvador.
The next morning, El Salvadori President Nayyib Boukil posted on social media a picture of the title of Judge Pasperg. “OOPSIE,” books. “It is too late.” By Sunday noon, the President’s office was released video The clips that are believed to be pictures of immigrants who are taken from a plane and transferred to a prison where the prison It is said exposure For torture and beating.
A prison de France de la Perresidsia/Reuters
Preventing a doctor from re -introducing the United States
A similar confusion broke out in the state of Massachusetts at the end of last week when Dr. Rasha Ella, an assistant professor at the University of Brown and a kidney specialist who lives in the United States in a specialized worker visa, refused to enter the country after a month -old trip to Lebanon. Customs agents and American border protection stopped her after finding “sympathetic” materials with Hezbollah on its phone, according to the court documents submitted by the government this week.
In the following hours, Judge Liu Sorokin released to request Dr. Alwi was not transferred without a 48 -hour notice pending her case. But the next day, it was placed on a trip to Lebanon via Paris. Prosecutors said that CBP agents did not hear about the court’s order when they did so, according to the court files.
“At any time it will not be [U.S. Customs and Border Protection] A CBP official wrote in a specific advertisement.
The government’s response to the TDA case was different. In a hearing in that case on Monday, the government argued that Judge Boasberg lost his jurisdiction on El Salvador trips as soon as they left the airspace.
Judge Pasperj replied: “I think it is quite clear that my just abilities do not stop at the edge of the water, at the edge of the airspace.” He added: “Isn’t the response to what you consider unconstitutional or inappropriate to appeal,” instead of moving forward and saying, “We will do what we want?” “
Troy A. Sambajon/The Christian Science Monitor
To follow the rules, or not follow the rules?
Conservatives argue that these rapid -footed measures are a necessary response after four years of enforcement of soft immigration during the era of President Joe Biden.
“President Trump uses every tool he must accelerate the removal of people,” says Dan Stein, President of the US Migration Federation. “Maybe he will be successful in this process; he may not do it.”
However, the executive procedures, as we saw last weekend, could at least risk the appearance of judicial orders that are ignored. Now, compliance with the courts’ orders on immigration procedures and others is something that federal judges around the country wander around.
These are the complex issues, the granular that has been removed from important questions, such as whether Mr. Trump’s summons to the law of foreign enemies is legal. But legal experts say the judicial review here is crucial to the balance of power that supports American democracy.
Understand that government agencies, government actors, will abide by the provisions of the Federal Court [is] Dennis Gilman, co -director of the Immigration Clinic at Austin University of Law, says it is essential for our government system.
One case on federal workers, and another on the US Agency for International Development’s payments
The trend seems to be that the executive branch extends to the line between obedience to the courts, waiting for appeals or delaying the required changes.
In two cases, for example, the Trump administration has been ordered to rehabilitate test staff over the past two months. But the court files were submitted by the government on Monday I revealed this Of nearly 24,500 employees by the government, almost all of them were reset, then they were placed immediately on an administrative leave.
In another case, Judge Amir Ali ordered the government to conduct payments from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to work that has already been completed before administration officials stop all payments from the agency. Trump administration attorneys have said that these payments have not been frozen since then. But they are now reviewing a case before they were released.
Judge Ali said earlier this month that he is working to ensure that the government corresponds to the payment order with “ensuring that the feasibility is given.” In the case report last week, the organizations that filed the lawsuit claimed that they were still waiting for $ 228 million in the completed work payments before the initial funding of the American Agency for International Development.
The government said it expected to complete the treatment of payments this week. Another report is worthy today.
This type of legal confrontation continues under Judge Sorokin In Massachusetts and Judge Pasperg, Washington, DC
Professor Farber says: “All this is a type of procedural things,” says Professor Farber. But if the judge wants to determine whether the government is “deliberately disobeyed”, he will add: “The judge will have to deal with all these arguments.”
Editors ’note: This story was updated to notice that customs agents and American border protection, not border patrol agents, interacted with Dr. Rasha Allow from the University of Brown.
