MPs continue to back assisted dying bill, amid complaints multiple amendments not voted on – UK politics live | Politics
With the assistance of supporters of the death bill to vote to an amendment from the fight against the anti -anxious deputy with the majority of 36
The speaker reads the result of the partition.
Rebecca Paul NC10 (A) defeated 279 votes to 243 – a majority of 36.
This is all time for today.
The spokesman asks when the bill returns, and it is informed on Friday, June 13th.
Representatives are now moving to other private member bills on the request sheet. One by one, they are delayed after MP creatures. (At this stage of the day, special members can only be able to read the second if not one of the creatures.)
Main events
“Sufficient” – Representatives complain after Bill’s dead modifications with multiple help that have not been voted, or even a discussion
Today’s procedures in the House of Commons must renew the debate on whether the subsidized draft death law receives an appropriate audit. The deputies spent four and a half hours in discussing the draft law, but many deputies who made amendments did not get a chance to speak, and in the end only two amendments were made to vote.
Many deputies argued that, because of its importance, the draft law on a member should not be a private member, and instead it should have been adopted as a government law, which would have enables more time to discuss and vote in the report.
(An alternative point of view is that the special members ’bill procedures should be reviewed, so that you do not face arbitrary pieces at 2.30 pm on Friday.)
Conservative Deputy John Lamont This On social media The discussion has also ended.
Suicide supporters with desperate help to close their plans.
It is impressive that the debate has been closed in the House of Commons – we need a suitable time to consider these plans.
This is not like any other decision made by Parliament.
And the deputy work Mike a reader to publish this.
Regardless of your opinions on the draft adults with absolute diseases (the end of life), also known as suicide with help or death with help, people must agree that the time it was allocated to discuss the proposed amendments to the draft law is insufficient. I am disappointed that it appears to be a campaign to rush to it, supported by some important and well -funded lobby groups.
During the same discussion, the deputies also complained about the lack of time.
Here is the work clip Jess Asato Make this point. (Look 1.38 pm.) ASATO and Lamont vote against the second reading bill.
Here is the conservative deputy Nile Operen It is now complaining about the presence of enough time to properly look at the arguments.
O’Brien said that he was not against helping in principle, but he voted against the draft law in the second reading, as Lamont, reader and Moto did.
With the assistance of supporters of the death bill to vote to an amendment from the fight against the anti -anxious deputy with the majority of 36
The speaker reads the result of the partition.
Rebecca Paul NC10 (A) defeated 279 votes to 243 – a majority of 36.
This is all time for today.
The spokesman asks when the bill returns, and it is informed on Friday, June 13th.
Representatives are now moving to other private member bills on the request sheet. One by one, they are delayed after MP creatures. (At this stage of the day, special members can only be able to read the second if not one of the creatures.)
The spokesman for the ARMS sergeant asked the AYE lobby.
This is what Mark Darcy, The veteran parliamentarian and commentator said On social media About the last delay. (He sees 2.13 pm))
Bad mark when you get delay in voting pressure-PMB time tactics in old school?
Welfare Minister Stephen Kenock about the reason for the NC10 (A) vision, is now voted, as it is not applicable
During his speech Stephen KinockThe Minister of Welfare suggested that NC10 (A) would not be applicable.
He said:
It is not clear how this aims to work as well as other obligations for professionals elsewhere in the bill to perform certain duties. As a result, employees may end with conflicting obligations.
Also, it is not clear how this amendment will work while protecting employees from unfair damage and dismissal by their employers, if they choose to participate in providing death with help.
If employers can prevent the entire workforce from participating in providing death with help, the service may not be available or it may be more difficult to reach it.
Representatives vote on the amendment that would allow the presidents to stop their workers to provide death services with help
Speaker, Lindsay HellNC10 moves. (He sees 10.22 am). It passes by increasing.
They are now voting on NC10 (A), an amendment to the NC10 presented by Rebecca Paul, the opponent of the bill. This will ensure that employers who oppose death with help can prevent their employees from providing death services with help.
Supporters in death winning the first vote, by a majority of 49
Death supporters won the help of the first vote, a procedural vote to move to votes.
The closure movement was passed by 288 votes to 239 – a majority of 49.
The spokesman sent the weapons to investigate the delay in the lobby.
(This may be the deliberate time to waste.)
Ayes of Ayes are Bambos Charalambous and Sarah Owen, who are supporters of the draft law who were AYes ATAS to vote on the second reading in November. both of them exhaustion Representatives.
The ATMs in Noes are Patricia Ferguson and Ruth Jones, who voted against the draft law in the second reading.
All of them are the representatives of the Labor Party.
Therefore, although this is a procedural vote, it is in practice, it amounts to an agent or against the bill. Not to pass the closure proposal, allow discussion to go, etc., is a way to destroy private member legislation.
Kate Malthous, The supporter of the draft law transmits the closure movement (“that the question now be asked”. Some members of Parliament, thus the speaker invites a division.
This is not a vote on an amendment. It is a vote to end the discussion and move to votes.
Jeremy Wright (Chews) asks whether the committee that is looking for deaths with the help of the help will be able to consider matters that were not presented before that.
Kenoc He says that the painting should be convinced that the correct steps have been taken.
He says that the government’s view is that the amendment of Wright on this (amendment 47 – see 1.15 pmIt is that the purpose of this is already covered in other parts of the bill.
