NASA denies setting ‘new bans’ for employees amid reports of removing LGBTQI+ symbols from offices
When buying with links to our articles, it may gain the future and partnership partners in the commission.
A series of reports written by NASA’s Inspector Office written by NASA against problems in the Information Technology Department in general at the Agency and Cyber Security in particular. | Credit: Getty Images
NASA has been scrutinized over the past few weeks due to its compliance with the executive orders formulated by US President Donald Trump. These orders directly affect all federal organizations and their children, for example, The Space Agency forced the end of initiatives It focuses on diversity, fairness, integration and accessibility initiatives, as well as rubbing their websites from the topic related to the topic.
Recently in the epic, Reports submitted Through the Nasa Watchdog website, NASA Watch suggested that it is asked to remove any symbols that might represent LGBTQI+ PRIDE of their work spaces. In response to Our coverage of this reportNASA spokesman via email to Space.com sent a statement on February 11 saying the following:
“There is no new ban on any personal effects on employee work spaces. As is always the case, elements must adhere to legal and negative guidelines and principles. Work spaces, but there are no penalties or warnings about their position on administrative leave to display personal things.”
According to what was reported, this same statement was sent via e -mail to Nasa Watch on February 11, After four days The original site post on the topic. Sources whose name was not revealed in NASA headquarters Those who submitted NASA Watch with LGBTQI+ representatives that are removed from the agency’s offices did not comment on NASA’s response.
Before the agency’s statement, the members of the US Survey and Navigation Committee in the United States Zoe Lovgrin (D-CA) and Valerie Fush (D-NC). Speak in a common message About the concept of NASA management that limits gear staff related to their pride in their work spaces.
They said: “This is ridiculous and directly assaulting freedom of expression and humanity for NASA employees,” this censorship approved by the government is the latest attack on the rights of federal employees and should not stand. “
However, this is only one example of how President Trump’s executive orders swept general criticism of NASA. For example, an internal note was sent In late January – This was based on written instructions from the US Personnel Management Office – Acting NASA Director Janet Petro And meet Negative From the scientific community.
In addition to defining the efforts made to remove the DEIA language from the agency’s sites, claiming that “these programs divide the Americans according to the race, the taxpayers of taxpayers are lost, and resulted in disgraceful discrimination,” this memo was provided with employees a warning. He said that lack of progress in time with evidence of possible efforts to sabotage orders related to the purification of the Deia initiative, may lead to “severe consequences.”
Email screen shot was sent to all NASA employees. | Credit: NASA
– Trump orders NASA president to end the Dei initiatives
– Scientists were anxious when the Robin Observatory changed the biography
– Who is Janet Petro, Trump’s choice to represent the NASA official?
It is claimed that the workers in NASA have also been asked to “drop everything” and remove the signals of terms such as “indigenous”, “environmental justice” and “anything that specifically targets women (women in leadership, etc.),” according to An internal guidance obtained by the independent news site funded by the journalist 404 media.
But NASA is not the scientific organization funded by the only federal government that adheres to the White House requests from the Dia language; the Robin ObservatoryFor example, she modified many sections of her website, The most prominent biography of Vera RobinWho was called the Observatory. It was a pivotal force in the discovery of dark matter, and it is widely respected to break the barriers on women in this field.
