With the transfer of the presidential elections, the United States was shocked by its lowest level in a rough speech. The news course can barely keep pace with the insults between the candidates. Such a time when he was called the sitting president, who lost the elections, “hateful hermaphrodis”. He accused the next president of being a populist who was wrapped from his ambition.
Joe Biden opposite Donald Trump? No, John Adams opposite Thomas Jefferson.
Each of the founding fathers, who collaborated in the declaration of independence, was injured by other strikes in the 1800 elections that they had not spoken for a decade. However, until I dine the wins can be set aside. The two men, who died on the same day in 1826, restored their friendship through correspondence.
Why did we write this
Focus a story
Is it possible to move the balance of the discourse – in the power halls, on social media, and in dinner tables – again towards some aspects of chance and respect?
The annuals of political history are filled with examples of politicians and critics who practice full advertisements for opposition candidates. (Although insults such as “Dealer Nutmeg” and “Puzzlewit” – which were settled in Abraham Lincoln and William Howard Tuffle, respectively – have cut off the end of endless screams from “fascism” and “GROOMER”.)
As anyone who has seen a political declaration in the past decade knows, it seems that the increasingly vulgar attacks have become a new natural. Coarse language, accusation and threat are now record advantages of presidential campaigns.
The screen reached many thinkers to ask how we got here. Many, perhaps not surprising, are looking forward to history to obtain answers to our deteriorating current dialogue. Others peel the dynamics of work in the twenty -first century policy. He asked the screen whether it was possible to move the discourse balance – in the halls of power, on social media, and in dinner tables – again towards some aspects of the chance and respect.
What should history tell us?
For one reason, multiple sources that were interviewed indicated that the founding parents did not trust the political parties. They never imagined the current sports atmosphere, as the country was divided into two teams that have increased bitter competition.
“I think the founders will only go, this is not what we wanted. We have designed a kind of federalism as it would be good for different parts of the country to do things differently. Monica Joseman, author of the book“ I did not think about it in this way: How do I hold curiosity without A fear of dangerous times, “should not be an existential crisis for everyone.”
Actors, including a couple of Christswomen recently, offered their colleagues to Fisticaffs. This is a big exercise compared to Aaron Poor-Alexander Hamilton Diwil, who ended with the death of Hamilton. “Politicians in the nineteenth century are still unparalleled when it comes to personal violence.
“With the growth of the debate about the civil war, the actors carried knives and guns on the ground and sometimes describing them. He explains that the speech can be very ugly.
One day in 1856, Charles Somner, the cancellation of the frank cancellation penalty from Massachusetts, was sitting on his office on the Senate floor. Dr. Altcholler says, saying that Preston Brooks, an actor and farmer in South Carolina, hit his Republican colleague Tim Porsche in the Congress halls. (Mr. McCarthy denied this accusation.) “It diminishes comparison.”
So, does this mean what is happening now is not a big problem?
Today’s level of violent political discourse is concerned. Dr. Altcheler and others point out that violent and violent words are often associated. They mutually support each other. We saw this, of course, on January 6, 2021. Reports certificate from the electoral college.
How did we get to where it is common to accuse a person who does not agree with children?
There is tension in our political culture “Swallow Cord GuardMatt Wilsh, the editor in “Miley” magazine, says. From his point of view, the guards trying to police discourse – for example, are trying to make the “Latin” happen – they irritate the ordinary Americans, who then resort to the leaders to throw rocks on their behalf.
“We live in this type of vulgar moment. It is difficult to stop them, especially because institutions in the media – especially over the past nine years – have really traveled to a more partisan, ideological and more consistent place.” “Thus every time Trump does something, or a Trump -like person, he does something interesting, then you can ensure that a huge pile – this type of media group here – will break and express anger. Caricature late at night will flow with anger And try to make a joke.
Also, the rise of populism in the celebration era plays in the speech of the speech. The circus was called, and the word “vulgar” appeared frequently. Everything, those who were interviewed, by design.
“If you look at a person like Javier Millie in Argentina, for example, … power in the new millennium,” says Martin Guri, author of the book “The Audience Revolution and the Crisis of Crisis and the crisis of a crisis. “This is not a personal strangeness. This is a political situation. [He is] Saying, “I am not them.” … there is a kind of distinctive elements that peoples bring with their speech. “
He refers to opinion polls that found that the first coalition in elections in President Trump was different and voted in his favor for various reasons. But “they all thought about one topic, and he speaks like me,” he added.
Why do the populists communicate with the audience using the coarse language?
“There was a lot of shift in the center of gravity towards the place of interest. Communication technologies, social media and the media themselves – with their economic incentives – all gather to reward politicians who can get attention. The easiest way to attract attention through emotions such as fear and anger. The lady says. Joseman, an older colleague at Braver Angels, is an organization in the country that facilitates the civil talks between Democrats and Republican voters: “Fear is strongly strengthened, because fear remains with you.” Especially, but who is interested in the politicians are very excited to stay in their jobs, and it is very strong.
Is there any light at the end of this very dark tunnel?
“It will take a different kind of speech to replace this speech. Dr. Altcheler says:” It is not the oldest speech of literature and fake respect for another person, but a discourse is more close, only to martyrdom with an example, John Stewart. ” From vulgarity and sexual images that we see now. I think it will take skilled speeches. “
How do state governments compare atmosphere in Washington?
“The reason we started studying the Ki’as in the first place is that it can have effects on the broader issue of governance. Does it affect the ability of the legislative body to do its important work in legislation on important matters per day?” Says William Sharezz, head of the science department Politics at Arkansas University.
“The strange thing in the legislative bodies of the state today is that they are not as waters as you think.” Study 2024 It measures the degree of chicks and decorations throughout the legislative bodies of the state. That is because they are not miniature. “So in Arkansas, we are all conservative. In Washington State, they are all liberal. There is some polarization, but you do not have this wide range of ideology a lot.”
“Some of the extremely polarized legislators tend to be a little less than civilians, but most unstable legislative bodies are not necessarily the most attractive. So what he does is that this allows this independent interpretation of legislative productivity. In almost every model … what we found, yes, The more the legislative council for the state, the more likely they will pass a larger volume of bills. ” “A higher percentage of the bills that are offered will be passed, it is likely to pass more important legislation, and a budget is likely to be transferred on time.”
Joel Martinez/Screen/AP
What can people do to publish more chassis instead of feeling impotence?
“I am a big fan of the little start,” says Ms. Joseman, from the start of dialogue in neighborhoods, schools and families. “If you cannot take steps in your private life, how do you expect the entire country to run suddenly the ship?”
She says that change begins to question your thinking, and not by trying to change another person’s mind: “It begins with how to respond to the person you met and who believes this thing is different from abortion, about migration. ‘What ideas come to mind for me? What do I assume? You say? To ask yourself. “How does this contribute to this evil session that tears us, as we share each other in political differences, while we judge each other over time?
“We do not see the real discussions, and certainly do not see the real people. If you don’t see the real people, we will not have a democratic republic. He returns directly to the founders. They knew that the partition is part of the game. But not deciphering. You have to deal with the section.”
On the state government front, Professor Schreckhise says that the work has already begun to teach the importance of the pillars to pass the laws, and therefore, the government’s mission to do.
“There are already some works that are carried out on the ground by the organization [the National Institute for Civil Discourse] Who holds training courses for state legislators. They did one here in Arkansas where they get a group of legislators, and they send them back, and they talk about how they were more civil. He explains them, “They train them in the language of Al -Kisa.” “If you have both parties to lead legislators, this type of things is pushed to the arrangement and the file, it sends a sign that it is” hey, this is an important type, and we may rethink you behave when we talk to each other. “
