Paris museum exhibit shows art in the crosshairs of politics

Paris – If all you saw in the exhibition at the Picasso Museum here is the same art, you will immediately get to know that there are great paintings, strong halls, from many decades and countries and artists – Van Gogh, Klei, Picasso of course, Candinsky, Chagal, Landscape, Pictures, Migration and Hurricanes.
But what is the topic, the concept of organization?
It’s hate.
The unified topic is that each of these works, and other thousands, was despised by Hitler and the third sheikh as “an amazing art”, which is destined to burn, sell, hide, or lose it during the ten ten years, “determinants”, “specified”, “specified”, “specified”. “The Bolshevik” and “Jews”.
The exhibition, “The Art of Diaasts: Modern Art in the Trial under the Nazis”, is located in this museum until May 25. It is in the Maris region in Paris, which was once the center of the Jewish life of the city. It is the first such exhibition in France.
It takes a lot of time to assemble many artworks from many different groups and museums, but the show launched by the coincidence is not after one month of Donald Trump as president.
His name does not appear in the exhibition, but the communication is clear if it is not visible.
Since Trump took office, the art world has seen his mission to end the art of “waking” in Federal programs and institutions funded by taxpayers. He justified his seizure of the John F. Kennedy for theatrical arts by demanding social media that he will put a “wake” performance performance and “anti -United States propaganda”. The Board of Directors filled with the allies who voted as a director. He reduced the entire national donations to finance the arts from its proposed budget. Vice President JD Vance was assigned to remove the “improper ideology” from the Smithsonian Foundation, those things and ideas that “deteriorate the common American values” or “divide the Americans on the basis of race”.
President Trump stands in the presidential box wandering at the John Kennedy Center for Dramatic Arts in Washington on March 17.
(Associated Press)
The French Museum’s show offers this flashback to the afternoon, as, regardless of works, including those displayed here, the artists who created them were persecuted. Ernest Ludwig Kirchner, who died here Berlin Berlin in 1913, died of Berlin Street, at suicide in 1938.
The human head, like the amazing Easter Island in Otto Frewndlich, was on the cover of the original Nazi exhibition in July 1937 for about 700 “deteriorating” works, and under the German word “Art”-“Const”-in capital messages and quotes, and they left no doubt that the Nazis did not look at art all over the world.
Frendlich was sent to the detention camp on March 4, 1943, and he died there after five days. Before leaving the deadly train, he wrote a note for his partner and colleague, the artist, Jean -Kosnik Clos, ends, “Heaven may protect you and give you strength. I love you and I will always be with you.”
A room from the room, the works explode its topics, including “race and purity”, “cleansing German museums” and “trade in deteriorating art”.
In 1933, Mark Chagal’s intense painting of the Rabbi, “Soutaus”, was a clear goal. It was removed from a museum in Mannheim, and it was pulled through the city’s streets on a handcraft, and the Germans’ invitation to ridicule him, then put in the window of an art gallery with the “taxpayer motivation brand, you must know how your money has been spent.”
Others make you wonder how they became suitable. Why will the view of Van Gogh be striking, “poppy field”, is offensive? Perhaps because the Nazis ranked it as an anti -traditional as well as crazy, as they did the vanguard artist Elfred Luhassi and Wutcher. She was committed to asylum, as she drew pictures of her patient colleagues, some of which were shown here. The Nazis killed her under the forced essential killing program.

“Metropolis”, a painting by German artist George Grosss, is part of “the art of degradation: modern art in the trial under the Nazis” at the Picasso Museum in Paris.
(Stefan de Sakotin / AFP via Getty Images)
George Grosss “Metropolis” fabric was drawn during World War I and shows a night -willed street in the city. The Nazis was offered and then sold it in an auction, in 1939, as they did many of the artistic works they canceled, to finance their manual work. The painting ended in New York. And so did Grosss, who bought it after years.
Most work is perpendicular, on the walls. But horizontally, under the glass in a large table, I caught my attention: a severe group of newspaper scraps in the 1930s and the 1940s – it was completely the package – about the purification of “Hitler”.
The French are fair, so I think I read it correctly. One article, on August 20, 1937, from the French weekly videos, edited by a pair of Jewish brothers. The article appeared a month after July 18, 1937, when Hitler opened the Munich Museum of Nazi artwork. The next day, he visited the art exhibition.
Voila used the successive events of Hitler’s irony and taste in art, as well as “the violence of his methods and the size of his attack” against modern art.
This begins by reminding readers of doctors who are not efficient in the plays of French theater writer Moliere, men who offer the lives of their patients. Then Hitler resembles a doctor who warns of German artists from “paint according to my directives, otherwise you will be sterilized.”
Instead, the writer Hitler imagines the Germans advising to draw “scenes from the life of SS and SA”, the Nazi armed forces, Hitler, along with pictures of the heroic athletes in the position of the legendary German hero Sigarid, and “Women formed”.
Strongly, the readers explain some examples of Hitler’s work, and the wonderful and fixed products of the painter who aspires to art. Hitler twice applied and rejected twice for admission to the Vienna Academy of Fine Arts, which noted the “lack of drawing”.
The article notes that the powerful Vehur was “the paint brush was used recently” and “not only as HousePainter”.
The latter is a malicious point that was a permanent comedy of Hitler’s artistic recovery. There is a long time ago that a Crusade from Hitler against the “flowing” art partially grew from his academic rejection.
Trope “HousePainting Hitler” got a big boost, and a big laugh, in the 1967 movie “Mel Brooks”. The title characters find the worst scenario they can, written by a mad Nazi soldier played by Kenneth Mars. Schnapsed Mars goes in screaming against Winston Churchill“With his cigarette, with Brande, and his corrupt drawing! Fastin! Hitler – there was a painter!

President Trump’s painting is seen in the Great Floor of the White House, where Trump talks about investing in America on April 30 in Washington.
(Alex Brandon / Associated Press)
With Trump now issuing an executive about the contents of federal arts institutions, his own artistic tastes are highlighted, such as his passion for the paintings for himself, and he fondly for them. He and his supporters shared “fan” pictures of his drawing with a boxer, general and king. Recently received – It is said from Vladimir Putin – A picture of himself with the high grip after the assassination attempt in Pennsylvania last year.
A photo of him had been suspended in the Capitol building in Colorado nearly six years ago – a plate commissioned by Republican Colorado and paid for a campaign of $ 10,000 – was recently dropped after he drew Trump’s attention and announced that it was “really worse” a picture of himself.
In 2016, the Washington Post detailed how Trump spent $ 20,000 of his charitable funds. Buy a big picture for himselfHe was said to be installed in his club in New York Golf.
Years ago, when Trump invited his biography Tim Operation on his plane where Opion was looking for his 2005 “Trump Nation” book, O’Brien discovered what looked like the Renoir “two sisters (on the terrace). O’Brien said that Trump told him, “You know, this is an original Rainwar.”
In Podcast Valenty Fair, Opion said he told Trump, “Donald, he is not.” He said: “I grew up in Chicago, that Rainwar is called two sisters on the terrace, which is Hanging on the wall at the Art Institute in Chicago“
In fact, the origin of the institute was suspended for more than 80 years. O’Brien said it seems that the Trump version was transferred to Trump Tower, because it can be seen in the background when it conducted “60 minutes” Trump’s interview there long after the 2016 elections.
On the day before the 1937 “deteriorating” German exhibition, Hitler opened another artistic show, also in Munich – a gendani taste, “The Great German Art Gallery”. A lot of his speech He spent attacking the art he did not like.
“Cubism, Fadali, Future, Impressionist, etc., have nothing to do with our German people … so I will now confess, at this particular watch, that I have reached the final final decision, just as I did in the field of political confusion, and from now on the disposal of German artistic life for its phrases.”
“… with the opening of this exhibition, the end of the foolishness of German art and the end of the destruction of its culture will begin. From now on, we will launch an indisputable purification war against the last elements of rot in our culture …”
The German artist Otto Dix was not specified in the criticism of the painted war. He was already under the eyes of the Nazis who were rejecting for years, and several months ago from the “Determined” art exhibition in Munich, he reduced this challenge in a message to his “deteriorating” colleagues: “Then let us remain what we are.